Yes, that is true. You can't compare a small plane with a fully fuelled 767, that's why those cross-country flights were chosen.
But in the aftermath of 9/11, structural engineers and construction experts stated that they were astounded that both towers fell, because they were designed to withstand such an impact. Furthermore, oral histories taken by First Responders indicate multiple smaller explosions were heard. Lingering doubts will remain. Pieces of the puzzle we may not know for certain for a long time, just as there are still doubts about the full truth of the Warren Commission. I am not sure many want to know the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Hopefully, historians will dare to dig and reveal. Kwc Arthur wrote: Compare a fully fuelled 767 jet plane with a light prop one engine plane. The jet probably flying at twice or three times the speed of the single engine plane. Natalia wrote: Anyone else notice that Cory Lidle's unfortunate plane crash into a 52-storey residential building in Manhattan failed to result in the building's collapse, despite the speed and hit at the 20th floor level? Strangely, few died, and thousands didn't. Could it be that no demolition strength explosives were installed ahead of time, and that Dick Cheney and the DOD didn't need to hamper emergency response time by scheduling a mock air attack for the same day? _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
