Harry Pollard wrote:
> Something I discovered there amused me.
>
> You may recall that the actual number of excess civilian deaths
> in the war period was 21.
>
> These were found in 15 neighborhoods, so only 1 or so deaths were
> found in each neighborhood - to be magnified into 98,000.
>
> The report pointed out that "many" of these might be combatants.
> I found out that 7 of these 21 were criminal murders.
The very high crime rate in Iraq is also to blame on the
occupying force! Because the occupying force is responsible for
maintaining law & order in the occupied country. However,
the Halliburton junta obviously doesn't give a rat's ass about
Iraqi lives -- on the contrary, it's interested in a lawless
area where U$raeli "security" corporations can make maximum
profits, plunder the museums, eliminate all potential opposition
(just like their former ally Saddam had been doing (his way) before),
etc.
> So, the survey found 14 excess bodies ("many" of whom might be
> combatants) to build their case for 98,000 deaths.
>
> Of course, this 98,000 becomes many more, perhaps 200,000, or
> 300,000 as it travels around the Internet.
>
> So, you see why I call this "Slaughter of Armageddon proportions"
> nonsense.
For the perps it's always convenient and self-serving to deny the
number of victims, as you did on the Injun genocide. In Europe,
prison sentences are being handed out to historical revisionists.
Chris
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
