Former FWer D. Paull sent me a news item the other day about the Amero, a
proposed currency to replace the US dollar. The item that he shared comes
from World Net Daily, London Trader Urges Move To ‘Amero’
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53124
<http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53124>

There is a brief sketch at Wikipedia here
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_currency_union
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_currency_union> .  I wasn’t surprised
to see that there is a link to the conservative Fraser Institute in Canada,
scanning the page of hits on Google. The first listing on Page 2 suggests
this would benefit Canada most.
http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aoffi
cial_s&hl=en&q=Amero+currency&btnG=Google+Search
<http://www.google.com/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aoff
icial_s&hl=en&q=Amero+currency&btnG=Google+Search>

The author of this OpEd in the LA Times today is vice chairman of a Council
on Foreign Relations task force that produced the report mentioned below.
Some of this seems to be directed at the monetary concerns about the threat
to the US dollar by its foreign debt against the euro and our China/Japanese
bankers. Some of it seems driven by immigration/border issues, as well as
NAFTA/CAFTA.

We’ve discussed this before, but I thought it might be of renewed interest
given these recent news entries and current events.  KwC

Build economic bridges, not border fences
The key to immigration is investment and economic cooperation.
By Robert A. Pastor, LA Times, November 30, 2006

Robert A. Pastor is a professor and director of the Center for North
American Studies at American University and the author of "Toward a North
American Community."

THE ELECTION of a Democratic majority in Congress and the inauguration of
Felipe Calderon as president of Mexico offer our two countries an
opportunity to reinvigorate a deteriorating relationship and, at the same
time, build confidence in the idea of a true North American community. To do
so, the new leaders must change the agenda from illegal immigration to North
American development and resolve to narrow the income gap between Mexico and
its two northern neighbors.

Since President Bush took office in 2001, the percentage of Mexicans and
Canadians polled who view the United States favorably has declined by half.
There are many reasons, the most recent being the plan to build a 700-mile
wall between Mexico and the United States, after Bush had promised a
"comprehensive" immigration bill.

Early in their presidencies, Mexican President Vicente Fox and Bush made the
mistake of putting immigration at the top of the agenda. Migration is a net
cost to Mexico and a net benefit to the United States, but conventional
wisdom in the two countries begins with the opposite premise. Many Mexicans
see migration to the United States positively as an "escape valve" and a
source of remittances, while Americans exaggerate the costs to the United
States.

The main reason that emphasizing immigration was a mistake is that the
United States won't do the two things necessary to stem the flow of
migrants: strict enforcement of employer sanctions for hiring illegal
workers (because business wants a cheap, docile workforce) and creation of a
fraud-proof national identification card (because it is expensive and some
view it as intrusive).

Without these two measures, we should blame ourselves, not Mexico, for
failing to stop illegal migration.

However, for a long-term solution, we need to take another step. Migrants
come to the United States for higher income, and so the only way to stop
them is to narrow the income gap between Mexico and its northern neighbors.
The North American Free Trade Agreement succeeded in stimulating the economy
of northern Mexico because of its proximity to the United States. The north
grew 10 times faster than the south, but it served as a magnet, pulling
labor from the south. Part of the solution to Mexico's development problem s
hould be to extend NAFTA to the south with new highways. And then the jobs
would follow.

Bush and Calderon should work with Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper to
create a North American Investment Fund to invest $20 billion a year for a
decade in infrastructure — roads, ports, railroads, communications — to
connect the southern part of Mexico with the lucrative North American
market. Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) has introduced a little-noticed bill for
such a fund. The three leaders should support it.

The United States is unlikely to give any aid to Mexico unless Washington is
convinced that the funds will be well spent. That is why we should take note
of Calderon's comments to Bush at their meeting Nov. 9 and hold him to them:
"I did not come to the U.S. looking for the Americans to solve Mexico's
problems. We have to solve them on our own." If Mexico undertakes needed
reforms on energy, electricity, education, labor and taxes, and puts up half
of the money for the North American Investment Fund, the U.S. and Canada
should pledge the other half.

Such an initiative would not only begin to heal the political and economic
division within Mexico, it also would stimulate the second-largest, but
potentially fastest-growing, market for U.S. goods.

And although it would not stop illegal migration soon, if the initiative
succeeded in doubling Mexico's growth rate, the income gap with the U.S.
would be reduced by 20% in a decade, and Mexicans would begin to think about
their future in Mexico rather than seek jobs to the north.

The U.S., Canada and Mexico should stop debating NAFTA and blaming each
other for migration and begin collaborating to make the continent more
competitive, as they work to integrate a developing country into a First
World economy.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-pastor30nov30,0,5431527.story?coll
=la-opinion-rightrail
<http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-pastor30nov30,0,5431527.story?col
l=la-opinion-rightrail>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to