Harry Pollard wrote: > I just googled and read the first one that came up. > > The piece brought in a number of outside contributions > which I haven't checked, but hqve simply accepted.
This sums up your position on SUVs, CO2, DDT, Iraqi death toll etc. pretty well. > The reports of the survivors offer little help as they > didn't know anything about why the attack was made. But they know that the US President ordered US forces to turn around. That says it all. > I can see no advantage to the Israelis in deliberately > attacking an American ship. This intelligence-gathering ship witnessed war crimes on the land (IDF executing Arabs POWs). The IDF tried to eliminate the witnesses. http://www.wrmea.com/backissues/0596/9605028.htm > However, I'm not particularly interested. It happened 40 > years ago and has disappeared into the mist of time. War crimes don't become time-barred. Anyway, if this event sheds light on the background of 9/11, it was "worth it"... Chris ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword "igve". _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list Futurework@fes.uwaterloo.ca http://fes.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
