Keith,

 

Some time ago I saw an interesting letter from a San Diego dentist who
accepted local money.

 

He was pulling out. There was little he wanted to buy from the members
of the local currency plan. He essentially was giving free dental work
to the other members.

 

Harry 

 

*******************************

Harry Pollard

Henry George School of Los Angeles

Box 655   

Tujunga  CA 91042

(818) 352-4141

*******************************

 

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Keith
Hudson
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 8:02 AM
To: futurework
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Will Justin Yifu Lin be the person?

 

Charles,

Australia might be an altogether different country from this one but
we've had at least 200 or 300 local currencies over the past few years
and they've all collapsed.

They didn't collapse for lack of trust but because the skills and
goods that were available to the possessors of their currencies are
too restricted. Plenty of organic vegetables and reflexologists or
baby-sitters, but no electricians or plumbers.

Keith   

 At 22:56 09/10/2008 +1100, you wrote:



Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
        boundary="----=_NextPart_000_08F0_01C92A62.398C2FE0"
Content-Language: en-au

Arthur

 

You seem to consider that only global trust can be trusted.  In fact,
people trust those close to them more than they trust those they dont
know.  Hence, the push by many (including me) for a system of local
currencies backing up a global currency.

 

A local currency relies only on the trust of those who use it, and
hence it hardly ever collapses.  Provided the participants in such a
network of local currencies could exchange them with each other as
people move around (just as we now do with national currencies at
every airport in the world) such a system would be much more stable
than a system based on a global currency (which as we have seen is
subject to abuse by the powerful)

 

regards

 

Charles Brass

Chair

futures foundation

www.futuresfoundation.org.au <http://www.futuresfoundation.org.au/> 

phone: 03 9459 0244

fax: 03 9459 0344

 

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 9 October 2008 10:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Will Justin Yifu Lin be the person?

 

I don't see the advantage of having flexible McDollars.  Either there
is a universal currency with fixed terms, interest rates, etc. or
there is an array of national currencies.  Flexible McDollars means
that the value inherent in the brand can't be trusted: the trust that
adheres or is associated with a strong reserve currency as the pound
or dollar (at least that is the way it used to be)

 

Constructing a new universal currency seems an interesting idea, but
allowing local changes to suit local conditions seems to rob the brand
of its strength which in the end is : Trust and confidence.

 

It is as though McDonald's around the world could make changes at will
to suit local conditions: What then is a McDonald's?  (I realize that
McDonald's does make changes locally but these are well thought out
and ((I would imagine)) are made in ways that don't threaten the
brand.)

 

arthur

 

  _____  

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Keith Hudson
Sent: Thu 10/9/2008 3:20 AM
To: futurework
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Will Justin Yifu Lin be the person?

Arthur,

At 11:59 08/10/2008 -0400, you wrote:


Subject: RE: [Futurework] Will Justin Yifu Lin be the person?

Keith,
 
How have things worked with the Euro?  My understanding is that it
takes away from individual countries the power to set interest rates
appropriate to economic conditions.  National currencies at least
offered the power to devalue, revalue, raise or lower interest rates,
etc.  A universal currency means that nations have to move in concert
no matter conditions locally.  
 
Arthur


Very true, concerning the Euro. But I'm envisaging that a future world
currency would be issued by a retail universal bank, not the World
Bank as presently constituted (that is, as a consortium of central
banks). Let me call it a Universal Bank. It could be franchised to any
retail bank, business, pension fund or individuals which/who would
initially pay for the franchise in their own national currencies but
then operate individually with their new currency, and setting their
own interest rates according to local, regional, national
circumstances. Each franchisee would sink or swim according to the
skill and competence of their own organisations and the world currency
would operate in the market place side by side with national
currencies in a similar sort of way that the world population is
becoming bilingual -- English and Another.

I believe that something like a new world currency will be forced into
existence because the retail banks and central banks are losing their
original primacy in the scheme of things. Retail banks are no longer
the main source of capital for new economically-important ideas (which
need relatively large amounts of investment) and are increasingly
confined to lending to individuals and existing types of local and
middle-sized businesses. (Large businesses now increasingly issue
bonds when they want capital.) Central banks are reaching the limits
of the amount of cash they can print because (developed) governments
are reaching the end of their borrowing ability -- that is, taxation
powers (of both their own population and of sizeable commercial
operations, legal and illegal, that operate in and out of their
national boundaries).

There will always be a role for retail banks and central banks (using
national currencies) as we know them because of the mass of circular
financial activities and economic transactions going on within a
population. But there is now an increasing need for international
payments systems both for individual customers (catered for at present
by credit cards) on the one hand, and on the other for very large
businesses which would welcome a stable currency for their
international transactions without having to hedge their contracts
against currency speculators.

Keith
    

Keith Hudson, 

6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX

(044 1225 311636 or 312622) 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com <http://www.avg.com/>  
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1715 - Release Date:
08/10/2008 19:19

 

Keith Hudson, 

6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX

(044 1225 311636 or 312622) 

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
Version: 8.0.173 / Virus Database: 270.7.6/1716 - Release Date:
10/9/2008 9:44 AM

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to