I echo this posting.

 

How about a bunch of angry..(fill in the blanks)  

 

Aboriginals, pro-abortion, anti-abortion, pro-immigration, or
anti-immigration, etc.  Can't be done.  

 

arthur

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 7:16 PM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Fw: Some questions

 

A comment on my posting from a friend who was a senior public servant at one
time.

 

Ed

 

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Digby Hunt <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: Ed Weick <mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 4:28 PM

Subject: Some questions

 

        As I think I have said on perhaps too many occasions, whether it is
in politics, the corporate world, religion or almost any human endeavour,
the primary objective and main motivating force is the acquisition, exercise
and retention of power. >From my quite close association with several
political leaders I became convinced that they purposely cloaked their true
ambitions by claiming they are motivated by public service and a few delude
themselves to believe this. As you have heard a politicians capacity for
punishment is exceeded only by their capacity for applause. Of course smart
politicians keep a very close eye on the desires and needs of members of the
public and will take action where necessary to retain power and/or
influence. 

        The "Invasion" of Parliament by a group of mainly young people was
in my view completely unacceptable. Unless we maintain a reasonable level of
decorum in speaking out for or against a subject anarchy will eventually
ensue. Would you be so tolerant if a group opposed to allowing immigration
by specified ethnic or cultural backgrounds, disrupted parliament?  I think
not. Also please let go the view that all corporations are evil and in
effect should not be allowed to lobby. Sure they ask for grants, loans, loan
guarantees and special relief from some laws and regulations. Much of my
time was spent trying to persuade a Minister to say no and I would point out
that in almost all cases, even if they offered to share the results it
always meant our share is the profits and your share is the losses.  Oh well
enough for now.   Digby

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to