> > It is up to the people to remove the Predators from power, before the
> > Predators sink the ship.
>
> Where in history have vacuums created by removing "Predators" from
> dictatorial type positions in developed civilizations remained unfilled
> for more than a generation? I know of no examples.
You see, progress is about making things better than in the past.
For the first time in history, now the Internet enables people to learn
about Predator schemes, outside of the mainstream media that are
controlled by Predators. Once the majority has understood the harmful
effects of Predator rule, they will resist it, even if new Predators
try to "fill the shoes" of deposed Predators.
But of course, if one is stuck in a stone-age mindset, reading Wright's
pseudo-science about failed civilizations of the past (which all failed
due to Predator mismanagement or conquest by 3rd-party Predators, but
Wright managed to miss that), then this possibility is out of sight,
out of the mind.
> It is your contention that the few mutants are minuscule. It is my
> contention that millions are ready and eager to fill their shoes.
After WW2, a majority has learned to prevent another Hitler from coming
to power, although there certainly are many who would be "ready and eager
to fill (his) shoes". Why can't this work for any and all Predator rule?
> In the
> meantime the resource pie of natural wealth shrinks daily and over
> 200,000 more slices are needed daily for NET human additions.
The misuse of $billions by allegedly "philanthropic & environmentalist"
billionaires is responsible for the excess SIZE of billions of slices
(also their own very large slices).
This debate reminds a bit of the Israeli settlers who are filling their
swimmingpools in the desert and watering their lawns with the scarce
drinkingwater that Palestinian farmers would need to irrigate their fields,
and then the settlers complain that the Palestinians have too many children.
Who needs/squanders more water?
But of course, from a billionaire point of view ("a million (poor) isn't
worth one (rich)'s fingernail"), the solution is clear: Cull the masses!
Then there's enough water for the swimmingpools, and business-as-usual can
continue.
> The list can decide whose conception of reality is closer to their
> understanding/belief.
It is one thing to discuss the feasibility of overcoming Predator rule,
but it's quite a different thing to deny responsibility of large Predators
and blame the poor for enviro degradation. The latter hampers the former!
> I'm off to a week-end of decadent hedonism by the
> clean sea and air in mid-coast Maine.
Do you get there by bicycle (in order to not pollute the air of others)?
> Oh, re breeding: one child per family is the civilized way down. My wife
> and I had 1. Our son and his wife *may* have 1.
But a sterility virus (=what you wished for) means _0_, not 1.
If the hardcore Malthusians would actually walk their talk, this dogma
would end pretty soon...
> (emotionally I desire a
> grandchild, but am deeply concerned about the future for her/him.)
Meanwhile, those who don't care about the future multiply as if nothing
happened... To keep them in check, they'll have to be culled, or at least
a sterility virus has to be developed by the Genetic Tinkering industry
that Gates & Co. are funding with billions... (after all, they've already
developed Terminator Seeds for plants, so next come T.S. for humans...)
The only humane solution is _progress_ towards small eco-footprints --
i.e. not under the deliberately mismanaging rule of mega-polluter Predators.
> http://davidmdelaney.com/overshoot-in-a-nutshell.html
Why does he talk of a die-off, but you talk of a cull?
Have a nice weekend,
Chris
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
