Arthur,
 
I haven't read Daly for a very long time (and even then not that closely) so
I'm not sure if this was covered...
 
The real challenge to any future scenario are the LDC's... China, India and
Brazil are, as we know, moving forward very quickly and incuding greater or
lesser degrees of wide dispersal of the proceeds of "development"... There
are any number of other countries/peoples waiting in the wings for similar
develoopments once (if) they get their governance issues sorted out. (Good
governance IMHO will take even the most resource poor country quite a long
way in terms of "development")
 
ANYmodel of the future has to take all of the above into consideration and
what that means for a "stable/steady state" economy is that at the global
level it has to incllude somre reasonable standard of living for the other
5.5 billlion or so... 
 
Question, is that feasible/commensurable with that model?
 
If not, and I suspect that based on the resource availability assumptions
tossed around in this part of the (virtual) world, it may not be, then your
"(positive) image of the future" will need to include a "(postive) image" of
how we get from here to there, which I suspect is rather more difficult to
envisage than your first challenge.
 
M 

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 7:15 AM
To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Many of the jobs lost during the recession are
notcoming back



Agree.  When  we "hit the wall" the current economic model will change
drastically.

 

What is needed is a positive image of the future, even a future
characterized by "the new realities".  I favour some form of stable or
steady state economy a la Daly; or a variant thereof.

 

Arthur

 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Kurtz
Sent: Friday, May 14, 2010 9:42 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Many of the jobs lost during the recession are not
coming back

 

On 5/14/2010 9:26 AM, Arthur Cordell wrote: 

Increasingly people are needed in the economy as consumers, not producers.
It is in this sense that the production problem has been solved.


When throughput gets constrained by peak oil, peak fisheries, peak topsoil,
peak aquifers, peak forests/watersheds...and events like the current (now
10X more than estimated) oil leak hasten toxicity in the habitat...needing
greater consumption by more people will be the opposite of what is needed!

Steve

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to