Clive Thompson in the May/June Mother Jones:

"Peter Victor is an economist who has been asking a heretical
question: Can the Earth support endless growth?

"Traditionally, economists have argued that the answer is “yes.” In
the 1 960s when Victor was earning his various degrees, a steady rise
in gross domestic product (GDP)—the combined value of our paid work
and the things we produce—was seen as crucial for raising living
standards and keeping the masses out of poverty. We grow or we
languish: This assumption has become so central to our economic
identity that it underpins almost every financial move our leaders
make. It is to economics what the Second Law of Thermodynamics is to
physics.

"But Victor—now a professor at York University in Toronto—felt
something tugging him in the opposite direction. Ecologists were
beginning to learn that Earth does have limits. Pump enough pollution
into a lake and you can ruin it forever; chop down enough forest and
it might never grow back By the early ‘00s, the frailties of tire
planet were becoming even more evident— and unsettling—as greenhouse
gases accumulated and chunks of Greenland’s glaciers began breaking
off into the sea. “We’ve had 125,000 generations of humans; but it’s
only been the last eight that have had growth,” Victor told me. “So
what’s considered normal? I think we live in very abnormal times. And
the signs are showing up everywhere that the burden we’re placing on
the natural environment can’t be borne.”

"In essence, endless growth puts us on the horns of a seemingly
intractable dilemma. Without it, we spiral into poverty. With it, we
deplete the planet. Either way, we lose.
Unless, of course, there’s a third way. Could we have a healthy
economy that doesn’t grow? Could we stave off ecological collapse by
reining in the world economy? Could we do it without starving?

"Victor wanted to find out…

http://motherjones.com/toc/2010/05

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to