On 5/23/2010 7:23 AM, Christoph Reuss wrote:
> This can only be explained with a pathological greed / gambling addiction
>    

Those who are low profile and behind the scenes, are (IMHO) the largest 
manipulators. They control credit money creation (with its guaranteed 
interest free lunch), and they influence governments policies (politics 
in Chris's words below). There are millions (maybe hundreds of millions) 
of speculators. Those investing their retirement savings, buying real 
estate for second homes or investment (incl rentals),  buying artwork 
beyond the $100 decorative sort,  buying antiques, numismatics, 
collectibles, fine wines to cellar, etc are normal savers, hobbyists and 
partly speculators
> -- the insatiable can never reap enough.
Bell Curve puts some at the extremes, for sure. It may be power more 
than greed. It is an addiction. And I hate it as much as Chris does. The 
(free rider) taking of natural wealth and the dumping of wastes 
(economic externalities)are more damaging in my opinion, than the money 
in the bank. I did quote the Globe and Mail from the mid-90s on the 500 
mega wealthy families. Some are far more destructive than others in my 
opinion. Various mafias fit that bill
>   It would be the task of politics
> to prevent these individuals from destroying whole economies.  Antisocial
> speculation could simply be outlawed, if politics wasn't in bed with the
> speculators.  Politics has to be taken over by non-Predators to correct that.
>    
I agree, adding that imbalances will never be eliminated, and that 
protecting the commons is unquestionably of equal or greater importance 
in my view.

Steve

>
>    

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to