Steve wrote:
> This supports net zero migration for high consumption countries. The
> fertility of second generation (& older) women and their offspring in
> Europe , US, Canada (as examples) is below replacement. Without
> immigration, population there would be declining. And thus gross
> consumption and eco- footprint would be declining ceteris paribus.

So, shouldn't those billionaires, who claim to be environmentalists,
support zero migration?  Methinks they do the opposite.

Chris



~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
SpamWall: Mail to this addy is deleted unread unless it contains the keyword
"igve".


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to