Something else to digest, Ray. Perhaps I misunderstood your response
to Juliet Schor's message that I forwarded. I read your response as
dismissive toward Schor's model. Yet reading Natalia's post I fail to
see much of a difference between what Juliet was promoting and what
Natalia is relating. And you embrace what Natalia writes. Did I read
you wrong? Did I read Juliet or Natalia wrong?


On 6/28/10, Ray Harrell <[email protected]> wrote:
> Wow Natalia,
>
>
>
> Thanks.    That is a great post!       It will take me a few days to digest
> it and I will.    Do I remember right that you are Russian?    Were you
> trained in Russian schools to think like this?     If so, I would suspect
> that Russian will be the future complex culture of both the U.S. and Canada.
> Superior Russian performing artists are already taking over the Metropolitan
> Opera and America's cultural institutions.     The Chinese have the best
> creative representation with Chinese composers trained in the new programs
> of China.    There are more Artists in Training in China then there are all
> of the students in American Schools.    America is the only country in the
> world that speaks of people "not being able to sing."       All over the
> world people sing because it is what we do as human beings.    Here, only
> specialists sing, except in church.       They think in modules.    Lateral
> thinking in the brain that is usually associated with the male brain.
> Americans are so afraid of the secular that they've outsourced their
> throats.
>
>
>
> Neither the Russians,   the Chinese or the South Koreans are afraid to write
> and write until they exhaust the subject.      That is an old artist maxim.
>
>
>
>
> "You are not a hired hand.   You have to make a living and deserve to be
> paid but it isn't about profit, it's about making enough to capitalize your
> work and then it is about the work itself.   You give the work the required
> amount of time to complete it and the requisite amount of capital to have
> the tools and material  to complete it.     You do the work until its done,
> not until the clock says you can go home."
>
>
>
> That is why I am seriously interested in a list that calls itself
> Future-work.      Jobs are temporary, work is a lifetime exploration.
> In the Cherokee culture, work has been traditionally one of the four primary
> choices that you make in your life.       Work is Artistic and not the mode
> of the amateur Wall Street physicists who get bored with anything that has
> to do with sensing the problem in all of its connotations.
>
>
>
> That form of Capitalism has destroyed the teaching of the  Art of America
> and the art itself which only exists in literature, painting and sculpture
> all in the name of productivity.      They have destroyed the quality of my
> profession and now they are going after the colleges and public health in
> America.
>
>
>
> You could call that the economist as demonic in the pursuit of a gray world
> with no soul.     Cherokees call the afterlife the "Gray world."     Go to
> Huffington Post where they are trying to have an Art section.    All they
> can do is graphic arts and the rest is trinkets and trash and old European
> performing arts.      America has a very spotty identity and its only
> defense is to say that the mirror isn't necessary in order to comb their
> hair and fix their lipstick.       The Aztecs called such metaphors
> Tezcatlipoca or the "smoked mirror" because it was easy to trick people
> rather than the Quetzalcoatl which was a clear mirror (with a hole)  to both
> reflect accurately and see through to reality.      At 68 I can now say that
> Americans aren't that subtle.
>
>
>
> Thanks again for the big meal.   I will comment as it I digest it.
>
>
>
> REH
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Darryl or
> Natalia
> Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 11:40 PM
> To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] new/old member
>
>
>
> Hi Ray!
>
> Thanks for the posting. A few things there I'd never considered, but in
> pondering I begin to visualize and play out possibilities. Much of what is
> raised can be observed throughout the animal kingdom. I've heard of more
> related animal studies than those focused on humans--lately a couple on
> birds-- song birds and then crows, and one on primates. As is suggested
> below, a shift occurred post 1940's, and research focused on what delivers
> in a profit driven economy.
>
> Yet, the other larger shift in education (towards languages, technologies
> and sciences) has practically erased public school classes in art, music and
> phys-ed. These have become after-school activities, with even recess being
> structured, diminished and removed from children's natural playground or
> even from play itself. There is so little connection for them to their true
> source of health and well-being--that of the earth itself--that I fear for
> current abstract mind development. Little interconnectedness or cross-over
> can take place--that for which are minds are perfectly designed, but are
> unfortunately hard-wired at an early age to engage with tunnel vision.
>
> Your query, "Have you come up with a scheme for quality work that develops
> the human body, the sensorium, the soul and that makes money?" was too
> emotionally charged for most on this list, Ray. First of all, you have to
> provide scientific evidence that the soul exists. That if it exists, it
> appreciates financial compensation for any of its development/accomplishment
> as the sole functioning economic reality. Some here do not see the merits of
> artistic activity at all, and many would argue its source of inspiration.
>
> In recent discussions on the list, the revolving-door topic of a working
> economy came to full circle again. Again, I've raised the best case scenario
> of a sustainable economy based on natural laws as the only model that could
> possibly address all concerns of optimal needs and evolution. Inevitably I'm
> flattered as being an idealist, though not intentionally, of course. That we
> can likely only achieve this sustainability through education somehow
> digresses into a discussion on aggressive, competitive genes and so-called
> reality today. Not that these aren't interesting, but I feel frustrated over
> such defeatist conditioning because it precludes exploration of what is
> possible with the remainder of genes that predispose us towards
> connectivity, creativity and any transcending thought or activity. Though
> one may view today's model as having emerged from aggressive and competitive
> genes, I don't believe that most of what makes life interesting evolved out
> of those tendencies.
>
> This morning I was listening to CBC, a discussion on experiential learning
> for kids at UBC's city farm. A cooperative, as it could be pegged, of
> retired gardeners, teachers, volunteers and young students who get to
> experience the natural world of food and its benefits as part of their
> science studies. From soil nutrition to market, these children come to
> appreciate healthy choices, how to prepare food, and care for the land and
> tiny animals which make it possible. To hear a kid say that they will now be
> reducing their consumption of junk food in favour of vegetables, or to hear
> that they can now appreciate insects is hugely different from when I went to
> a public school (that still offered art, music, phys-ed). Most kids are
> still being taught an overview of food production as one of intensive
> livestock and monoculture crops. The latest scientific information is slow
> to be disseminated about practically everything, and what is taught is
> primarily focused on today's boring industries and market place. With such
> an impoverished agenda, adolescents become hugely unsatisfied, and are left
> to match mostly unrelated intellectual understanding with challenges, events
> and ideas bombarding a mind unprepared for abstraction. Becoming aware of
> physiology is now a dangling carrot of luxury, so overwhelmed are students
> with memorization of forgettable facts, and agendas of corporate profits.
> Unfortunately, they are as unprepared for natural disaster as for man-made,
> and in the latter we have clear example of how violation of natural laws is
> untenable.
>
> Where we have students graduating without a clue about natural expression,
> natural laws of any kind, we may have the next phase of resources
> exploitation preparing for more massive scale ecological rights wars. I'm
> hoping there'll be time to figure out that education has got to change, that
> Pharma has to let go of parents on anti-depressants who raise kids on
> anti-depressants, who in turn grow insensitive not only to their very source
> of life, but to their own capacity for individual development within our
> natural evolution.
>
> Great to hear from you.
> Natalia Kuzmyn
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Ray Harrell wrote:
>
> Hey Arthur, Steve, Tom, Barry and of course Sally and everyone else.   Have
> you come up with a scheme for quality work that develops the human body, the
> sensorium, the soul and that makes money?    Now that would be a futurework
> that I would be interested in even at my age.  :>))
>
>
>
> I'm currently reading and reviewing a wonderful book from MIT press
> (Bradford Book) called "The Origins of Music" edited by Wallin, Merker, and
> Brown.    Pub. 2000.     Here is the abstract from the Introduction.     I
> reformatted the section with bullet points.    In the book these two pages
> are a very dense prose that I found hard to read.    It also had typos.
> Hope you enjoy it.    Maybe a little discussion on the meaning of Quality
> work that develops both body and soul?
>
>
>
> REH
>
>
>
> Abstract:
>
> In this introduction to the new field of evolutionary musicology, we see
> that the study of music origins provides a fresh and exciting approach to
> the under-standing of human evolution, a topic that so far has been
> dominated by a focus on language evolution.   The language-centered view of
> humanity has to be expanded to include music,
>
> first, because the evolution of language is highly inter-twined with the
> evolution of music, and,
>
> second, because music provides a spe-cific and direct means of exploring the
> evolution of human social structure, group function, and cultural behavior.
>
>
>
> Music making is the quintessential human cul-tural activity, and music is an
> ubiquitous element in all cultures large and small. The study of music
> evolution promises to shed light on such important issues as
>
> evolution of the hominid vocal tract;
>
> the structure of acoustic-communication signals;
>
> human group structure;
>
> division of labor at the group level;
>
> the capacity for designing and using tools;
>
> symbolic gesturing;
>
> localization and lateralization of brain function;
>
> melody and rhythm in speech;
>
> the phrase-structure of lan-guage;
>
> parent-infant communication;
>
> emotional and behavioral manipulation through sound;
>
> interpersonal bonding and synchronization mechanisms;
>
> self-expression and catharsis;
>
> creativity and aesthetic expression;
>
> the human affinity for the spiritual and the mystical; and
>
> finally, of course, the universal human attachment to music itself.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Music Origins and Human Origins
>
>
>
> What is music and what are its evolutionary origins?
>
> What is music for and why does every human culture have it?
>
> What are the universal fea-tures of music and musical behavior across
> cultures?
>
> Such questions were the among the principal areas of investigation of the
> members of the Berlin school of comparative musicology of the first half of
> the twentieth century, as represented by such great figures as Carl Stumpf,
> Robert Lach, Erich von Hornbostel, Otto Abraham, Curt Sachs, and Marius
> Schneider.'
>
>
>
> After the 1940s, however, the evolution-ary approach to music fell into
> obscurity and even disrepute.
>
> How this came to pass entails a long and very political history, one that
> has as much to do
>
> with rejection of racialist notions present in much European schol-arship in
> the social sciences before the Second World War as
>
> with the rise of the cultural-anthropological approach to musicology in
> America during the postwar period.'
>
>
>
> Both influences were anti-evolutionary in spirit and led to a rejection of
> biological and universalist thinking in musicology and musical anthropology.
> Musicology did not seem to need an official decree, like the famous ban on
> discussions of language origin by the Societe de Linguistique de Paris in
> 1866, to make the topic of music origins unfashionable among musicologists.
> It appeared to happen all by itself.
>
>
>
> And with that, musicology seemed to relinquish its role as a con-tributor to
> the study of human origins as well as any commitment to devel-oping a
> general theory of music.
>
> The current volume represents a long-overdue renaissance of the topic of
> music origins.   If its essays suggest nothing else, it is
>
>
>
> that music and
>
> musical behavior
>
>
>
> can no longer be ignored in a consideration of human evolution.    Music
> offers important insight into the study of human origins and human history
> in at least three principal areas.
>
>
>
> First, it is a universal and multifunctional cultural behavior, and no
> account of human evolution is complete without an understanding of how music
> and dance rituals evolved.  Even the most cursory glance at life in
> tradi-tional cultures is sufficient to demonstrate that music and dance are
> essential components of most social behaviors,
>
> everything from hunting and herding to story telling and playing;
>
> from washing and eating to praying and meditating; and
>
> from courting and marrying to healing and burying.
>
>
>
> Therefore the study of music origins is central to the evolu-tionary study
> of human cultural behavior generally.
>
>
>
> Second, to the extent that language evolution is now viewed as being a
> central issue in the study of human evolution, parallel consideration of
> music will assume a role of emerging importance in the investigation of this
> issue as it becomes increasingly apparent that music and language share many
> underlying features.
>
> Therefore, the study of language evolu-tion has much to gain from a joint
> consideration of music.
>
> This includes such important issues as
>
> evolution of the human vocal tract,
>
> the hominid brain expansion,
>
> human brain asymmetry,
>
> lateralization of cognitive function,
>
> the evolution of syntax,
>
> evolution of symbolic gesturing, and
>
> the many parallel neural and cognitive mechanisms that appear to under-lie
> music and language processing.
>
>
>
> Third, music has much to contribute to a study of human migration patterns
> and the history of cultural contacts.    In the same way that genes and
> languages have been used successfully as markers for human migra-tions
> (Cavalli-Sforza, Menozzi, and Piazza 1994), so too music has great potential
> to serve as a hitherto untapped source of information for the study of human
> evolution.
>
> This is because musics have the capacity to blend and therefore to retain
> stable traces of cultural contact in a way that languages do only
> inefficiently;
>
> languages tend to undergo total replacement rather than blending after
> cultural contact, and thus tend to lose remnants of cultural interaction.
>
>
>
> In summary, these three issues,
>
> the universality and multifunctionality of music,
>
> the intimate relationship between music evolution and language evolution,
> and
>
> the potential of music to shed light on patterns of cultural interaction,
>
>
>
> are important applications of evolutionary musicology to the study of human
> origins and human culture.
>
> The new field of "biomusicology" (Wallin 1991) places the analysis of music
> origins and its application to the study of human origins at its very
> foundation.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 7:44 PM
> To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
> Subject: Re: [Futurework] new/old member
>
>
>
> Good to see your name again.  What's happening?  Same old.  People losing
> jobs.  Jobs going to China and elsewhere.  Automating work which increases
> productivity but those who lose jobs often have no place to go.  Needed is a
> total re-think of the way we produce and price goods and services and the
> way in which income is distributed.
>
>
>
> Arthur
>
>
>
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
> Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 2010 5:01 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [Futurework] new/old member
>
>
>
> Thought I would check in and see what's happening.
>
>
>
> Ray Evans Harrell
>
> New York City,
>
> Cherokee Opera Singer and Performing Artist
>
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Futurework mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
>
>
>
>
>   _____
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> avast! Antivirus: Inbound message clean.
> Virus Database (VPS): 100624-0, 06/24/2010
> Tested on: 6/24/2010 8:46:55 AM
> avast! - copyright (c) 1988-2010 ALWIL Software.
> http://www.avast.com
>
>
>
>
>
>


-- 
Sandwichman
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to