Ed, 

 

What's so hard about this?    No one is listening.    The NYTimes said that
the Lacrosse Federation would not accept them as a National Team if they
came with Canadian or U.S. Passports.     

 

Batesonian double bind.   Or as we say "between a Rock and a Hard Place".
The truth is probably that the Brits didn't want to risk losing a game to a
reserve.   But that is their ego problem.      That type of ego problem took
them into the Falklands and the U.S. to Granada.    

 

The problem here was that it was "Lieutenant Scheisskopf" all the way.
Catch 22.   [ You can't come without  fancy passports but if you have them
you can't play because you're not from a real nation.]    

 

Of course if they were from a Pacific Island Nation with representation at
the UN and 400 people, would the same be true of THEIR passports?      The
Iroquois Confederacy is larger than Lichtenstein.     More people, more
land, distinct language and culture and a history older than modern France
and they invented Lacrosse.       But the problem is the same as for Basques
of Spain or the Armenians in Turkey or the Kurds in Turkey and Iraq.    How
does it feel to be using the words of Sadaam Hussein talking about his
"Iroquois"?       "They were in the way."    After 200 years they're still
arguing over biological warfare here too.     There is a lot more distance
between the Iroquois and their neighbors than the Kurds or the Armenians
were with theirs.     Indian Nations in America have more  population than
Lichtenstein and a continuous culture, language and religion  for longer.
Hell there are more Muslims in America than Swiss in Switzerland.    This
team had plenty of creds.      

 

Britain didn't want to lose to them and besides they shouldn't give any
encouragement to the Catholics in Northern Ireland or the French in Quebec.
Reconciliation is really hard.   It takes sacrifice and integrity.
What would happen if this sovereign nation decided to take erase the
Canadian/American border that runs through their nation and set up their
roadblocks in and out of their country?       They've done that before and
they stopped traffic on a big International bride.      What if they
appealed to the UN and to China for development funds and set up a gaming
empire?    What, they've done that already too.     But they have been good
little Indians, a little surly but still "citizens."       Can't you see the
Canadians issues with taking over militarily and the U.S.?     The Canadians
have the French and the Scots and we have Texans:>))

 

The Brits, U.S. and Canada just didn't want the Indians to come and so they
set up a Catch 22.     This is not my first experience with this.      The
U.S. and Canada can talk about Reconciliation and Apologies but when the
ukstaha hits the fan they either mean it or they were just "fooling around"
and pretending that it was love.     Under U.S. Law and the Supreme Court
Indian Nations are "dependent" sovereign entities.    This is just the
latest skirmish that goes all the way back to the Cherokee Nation vs.
Georgia Supreme Court Case that Georgia lost and they sent us on a death
march anyway.     More of us died than at the WTC.  

 

I saw it happen again with our article to the Reconciliation Commission in
Canada, even though we were paid a good fee for the product.    It was too
serious and the assumptions they had were not (serious).      

 

This is the same cultural problem that David Kay spoke about when he said
the problem of WMD's in Iraq was that no one really knew anything about
Iraqi culture so interpreting  Saddam was semiotic.    Or idiotic.    "Maybe
culture is too much to ask here?"     Those were exactly David Kay's words
on C-Span.      Before that it was Edward T. Hall's when the State
Department hired him to teach them about culture.   He failed..     Cross
culture is just not a part of America's cultural image.    You're all
supposed to become good Englishman but not too English.    As a result we
have a cultural war with every culture speaking IT's English and claiming
that they are the only true version. 

 

It's really simple.    It's Bernard Shaw and Henry Higgins speaking for him.
Some people are sitting on one side of the problematic situation and see
that side but the others are sitting across on the other side from the same
problem and the view's so different that it doesn't even seem the same
problem.   Then there are the people on the left and the right who see half
of what both sides see but still think it's something else.      No one
seems to be willing to look for the whole.    No one is willing to ask and
no one is willing to give up the power their unique view affords them.    So
they fight.     That's Lacrosse.   That's the meaning of the ball as each
fights for winning over the other at carrying the ball, not in their hands
but in a stick. [The ball is too sacred to touch.     When they are through
they can sit down, ask questions, dance together and share their uniqueness
with each other and come to some kind of knowledge of what the real whole
happens to be.   

 

Unfortunately no one seems to really get the idea of a "Circle of Nations"
or a circle of cultural identities.        That's what is so wonderful about
music.    Everyone who performs knows that to do another culture's style or
context badly means you're a pig.     So they work hard to learn the other
style.    But that's Art and Art is of little value to the "practical world"
that got us into this mess with the environment and the banks.    Or is it?
Maybe we just sacrificed another Indian, like in the movies, for another
White man's growth or survival.       Been there, done that. 

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 3:55 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Fw: [Ottawadissenters] Fw: More dismal stuff

 

Easy, Ray, easy... and I don't like it anymore than you do.  All I was
saying is that if the Haudenosaunee really wanted to get to Britain to play
lacrosse, they would have to follow the rules that would get them there even
if they found those rules demeaning.  If, on the other hand, they were
trying to make a statement then I guess they put themselves into a position
that would enable them to make it.  I don't see it as a game, but the world
is a crappy place and if you want to move around in it you may have to do
things that you don't like.

 

Ed

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Ray Harrell <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME <mailto:[email protected]>
DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 

Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:26 PM

Subject: Re: [Futurework] Fw: [Ottawadissenters] Fw: More dismal stuff

 

You're really not getting it.   This is like the loggers road that was going
to destroy a thousands of year old meditation run for the Yarok religion in
California.    All of the Anglos and the Italian Catholics on the Supreme
Court said Tsk Tsk too bad but we move on, we have to have logs.  Then the
UN got involved and an international  indigenous group got involved and put
pressure on the state of California and they stopped the road.    The Yarok
culture is still there.     To you it's a game and a game has a social
purpose, to them it's a part of the religion as it is with us.     It's a
substitute for hostile action against those who oppress us.   It's called
the "Little War"   and it's a lot better than going to Iraq.    Would you
prefer suicide bombers?     These kids have a high suicide rate.    How long
before they realize what Islam has realized?   In short.   You are a smart
man and this is beneath you.     You should be better.   There are
consequences.        If you guys would like I would be willing to give the
list a primer instruction in this so you don't come off as brutes. 

 

REH 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 2:04 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Fw: [Ottawadissenters] Fw: More dismal stuff

 

It's too bad, but it's the kind of world we now live in.  I used to ride a
motorbike across the US border with nothing more than a driver's license as
ID.  I'm no longer doing that but if I were, I'd need a passport.  This is
the post 9/11 world.  The Haudenosaunee should have known what they were
getting into and should have been prepared for it.  You may not respect a US
or Canadian passport, but you may have to have it nevertheless.

 

Ed

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Ray Harrell <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME <mailto:[email protected]>
DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 

Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 12:20 PM

Subject: Re: [Futurework] Fw: [Ottawadissenters] Fw: More dismal stuff

 

Speaking of Values.     What's your thought on the Iroquois Nationals now
that Britain has banned them? 

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2010 8:08 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Fw: [Ottawadissenters] Fw: More dismal stuff

 

I know it's about values Ray, and values come with cultural perspectives.  I
spent a lot of my professional life working with and about Native people in
northern Canada and have a pretty good understanding of how their values
differ from ours.  I recall how, back in the 1970s, people of the Mackenzie
Valley first encountered the concept of land ownership.  "What?" they would
say, "owning the land?  Nobody owns the land.  It's just there."  Needless
to say, the guys from the oil patch who wanted to drill or build pipelines
saw things differently.  At the time, the Canadian government tended to side
with the oil patch.  It took a helluva lot of work to develop a concept of
land ownership that was accepted by both sides and to bring on the land
claims process.

 

Ed

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Ray Harrell <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME <mailto:[email protected]>
DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 

Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 5:07 PM

Subject: Re: [Futurework] Fw: [Ottawadissenters] Fw: More dismal stuff

 

It's about values Ed.    They value the wrong things.   A stone or a widget
or a piece of tar.   Consider the value of a song?   Consider a society that
rethought it's values and moved away from the market ideas of Mill and
Jevons.   Mill should have known better.  If he had not had Wordworth his
life would have been spent as a failure in the mental institution after the
terrible beating his father gave him.    Obama is a failure with Indians
because as a Black Man he missed the point completely of our history.
He's a failure with economics because he bought the European model of value.
Capital, is what it's all about.   You have to be willing to invest it in
real growth that grows people, not just is material transformation into
energy that dissolves.   Electricity and computers, bit rot and records.
All of our visual and literary treasures caught in a machine that could
disappear in a moment.   Someone's values are screwy and they aren't mine.
I still say it Hohokum.     I've had a computer crash and lost all of my
history except for what was in paper and had to redo thousands of pages and
I'm one person.   This place is nuts.    The first solar pulse to come along
and they will just disappear. 

 

REH

 

 

  _____  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

  _____  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to