Darryl wrote:
> My illogical "context", for you, was in not placing the Baylor
> University name /after /my comment.

Your statement was:

>>> And from Baylor University Medical Proceedings... for Smallpox It is
>>> likely of no consequence what the natives were eating (Amaranth alone or
>>> good mixtures of foods).

...to make it look like my Amaranth--virus connection was dismissed by
Baylor University.  If that was just your personal opinion, you should
have written "I think it is likely...".  Your bluff failed and now you
try to spin it like I made an illogical interpretation of the context.
Bad style!

The bottom line is that your anti-claim has no medical basis, whereas
the connection between arginine and susceptibility to viruses is well
documented and so important that Herpes.com's nutrition page literally
consists of a huge table of foods' Lysine/Arginine ratios!

Chris




_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to