Sad to say but it seems that Obama, like Reagan and Bush II was selected as
a mouthpiece.   Like it took a Nixon (a Republican) to go to China.  The
Republicans would have never allowed a Democrat to do it.    The Tea Party
has said that Obama is a Trojan Horse.   That may well be so but not for the
people they say but for the wealthy class.     They got the feeling right
but are too dumb to know the difference between the mask and the energy
behind it.    REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Sunday, November 14, 2010 10:14 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] whither the shining city?

 

Odd glimpses, like the item from the NYTimes I posted yesterday on members
of the Republican Party vying for big donations to help them get elected
make you wonder where our democracy is going.  

I have a couple of books, one I'm reading and the other I've read, that
argue that it already has gone.  The book I'm reading is Chris Hedges'
"Death of the Liberal Class".  As usual, Hedges swamps you with information
and gets some things wrong.  For example, we find the Michael Ignatieff is
leader of the Canada's Labor Party.  Hmmm... 

As far as I've read, Hedges quite strongly makes the point that the
political forces that made a strong case for the little man, for the working
class and unionization, and for widespread participatory democracy in the
US, are gone.  The liberal class has been co-opted by the wealthy and
powerful who really don't care what state the US is in as long as their
power and wealth grows.  So we still have people like Obama who say nice
things intended to make people compliant and happy, but who can no longer do
those nice things.  And it gets worse.  Big business has intruded itself
into a lot of things government does.  Hedges argues that a large part of
the US military procedure in Afghanistan or other theatres of hostility or
war is carried out by private companies that need and therefore promote
continuous large military and security expenditures to grow their wealth.
Hence the lobbyists; hence the Dick Cheneys and Halliburtons.

In reading Hedges, you soon find that you are reading an argument and not a
conclusion that is found after posing a question and undertaking careful
research.  Another book I've been reading recently tends to do the latter.
It's "Winner-Take-All Politics" by Jacob Hacker and Paul Pierson, two
political scientists.  Hacker and Pierson examine the period from the 1970s
to the present and find a very large shift wealth from the bottom and middle
classes of American society to the uppermost classes.  While all classes
gained some income between 1979 and 2006, the incomes of the top one percent
of all recipients increased by 256%!  By 2007, the richest one percent
received some 23% of all of the income earned or accruing to Americans. 

Along with this upward redistribution, the power of unions diminished,
unemployment rose and the political clout of the middle class faded away.

We Canadians like to look upon our neighbors to the south with a little
disdain.  Hey, we're not like that, we tell ourselves.  Well, perhaps we
are, at least a little.  Hacker and Pierson have a chart that shows that
Canada's top income recipients were not very far behind their US
counterparts between 1973 and 2000.  During that period, the share of income
held by the US top one percent rose from about 7% to about 16%, whereas in
Canada it rose from over 8% to over 12%.

So, what's all this mean?  There's a lot of verbiage out there about the US
declining economically while the BRICs, especially China, are rising.
Historically and even today, America is considered the world's principal
democracy, "the shining city on the hill".  China is not a democracy.  It's
an outstanding example of state capitalism in which the state counts, not
the citizen.  Does it matter that democracy is sinking, that the common
man's power is fading?  Well, to ever so many people who have lost jobs, who
cannot pay their bills, and who cannot save for retirement, it matters a
great deal.  It also matters to the idealist who believes in the shining
city.  But to the few, the top one percent or so, it really can't matter
very much.  The economy, whether national or global, is moving in their
direction.  And, like Obama, they can say the right things without really
meaning what they say.

Ed

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to