House of Lords and House of Commons?

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 9:07 AM
To: Keith Hudson; RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Two breeds (species?) of men

 

Not sure of any of this, Keith.  Is there really a self-renewing 'elite
class' in the sense that the progeny of the very bright and well-to-do will
become the leaders of the next generation and will in turn produce the next
leaders?  I don't think so.  Perhaps that's how things happen in the most
stagnant and unchanging societies, but surely not in societies in which
change is continuous and positive and in which new opportunities continually
arise.  I look, for example, at the social history of Canada during the past
century or so.  To get away from the repressive conditions of their
homeland, the poor and wretched of Europe came here during the early to mid
years of the past century.  They may not have done well, but their children
did, and in many cases did far better than Canadians of Anglo origin who
were the elite of the earlier part of the 20th C.  I've known several people
who came from very poor parents who migrated from eastern Europe but who
became doctors, professors and business leaders in Canada.  In a
hierarchical society of strong class distinctions those people may never
have gotten anywhere.  But open things up and the results may be quite
positively amazing.  

 

Ed

 

----- Original Message ----- 

From: Keith Hudson <mailto:[email protected]>  

To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, ,EDUCATION
<mailto:[email protected]>  

Sent: Tuesday, December 28, 2010 3:10 AM

Subject: [Futurework] Two breeds (species?) of men

 

It's likely that we will never have an egalitarian society for one simple
reason -- the increasing complexity of our economy. 

The intellectual potential of any individual is largely fixed during the
pre-puberty years. His or her social and economic potential is largely fixed
during adolescence and very early adult years.

For six million years of hominin existence this never used to be the case.
All the children of a group, whatever the rank order of their father,
experienced an almost identical environment around them. The massive culling
of neurons and the shaping of mental networks that takes place in the rear
cortex (perceptual and activity skills) would have been very similar. Today
it's different. Because of totally different home environments there's an
average gap of at least three or four years in the educability of children
at puberty between those in private schools and those in state schools.

During adolescence, when millions of new neurons are grown in the frontal
cortex (social and future-planning skills) and new mental networks are
created, life-long social associations are created and the previous skills
gained by the rear cortex are developed and refined for adult use. By the
age of about 30 this is mostly over. The creativity of new ideas, career
specialization and social ranking (relative to the masses, but not yet
within the elite) is largely fixed.

Ever since we left hunter-gathering behind and became civilized we have
become -- largely -- a two class society. In agricultural times the elite
class was very small indeed. In modern industrial (post-industrial?) times
the elite class is much larger -- about 25% I would estimate. This elite
class ranges from the very rich down to the specialized professionals
(increasingly that of scientists). Although very varied in composition, the
elite class is cohesive and socially interactive because they all send their
children to the same thin stream of private schools and the latter in turn
tend to go to elite universities. Friendships and social "debts" made there
tend to last for life.

The Jesuits knew all about this. "Give us a child for seven years and he
will be ours for life."  Count von Bismark knew all about this when he was
the first to institute free state schooling in Prussia for every child of
poor parents in order to produce a conditioned population who would
willingly follow him into warfare. England and other countries of Europe
soon followed.

So there we are. Unless nation-states can release education to the choice of
parents and quality competition between schools -- as applies to most
consumer goods and services -- then the present socio-economic gap in
Western countries will only widen further in the coming years as jobs become
even more complex. It seems unlikely, but one or two advanced nations are
making feeble attempts and there are a few reformers such as Peter Lampl in
this country, so I could be wrong. 

But, otherwise, two distinct breeds of men seem certain in the foreseeable
future. And then, given that biologists are already adding to our genetic
knowledge at a rate never known in science before, it might only take one or
two genetic tricks . . . .?

Keith




Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2010/12/
  

  _____  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to