Good move! :>))

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Harry Pollard
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2011 3:52 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Many With New College Degree Find the Job Market
Humbling

 

Aldous Huxley in the preface to his Brave New World Revisited (p. viii),
wrote, "If I were now to rewrite the book, I would offer a third alternative
... the possibility of sanity. Economics would be decentralist and Henry
Georgian."

 

Harry

 

 

******************************

Henry George School of Los Angeles

Box 655  Tujunga  CA 91042

(818) 352-4141

******************************

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 9:30 AM
To: 'Keith Hudson'; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Many With New College Degree Find the Job Market
Humbling

 

Brave new world.

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2011 11:01 AM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Many With New College Degree Find the Job Market
Humbling

 

But this is also happening in a growth economy, never mind the sour ones in
most advanced countries. It's already the case in China that many (perhaps
most) of their thousands of graduates -- even in engineering -- are not
finding jobs that matches their credentials or their talents. The irony is
that, just as skill standards are rising in today's high-tech economy, the
proportion of those necessary to produce the tradable goods is still
contracting. It's been doing so ever since the medieval days when something
like 70% of the population were growing food and supporting the 20%
remainder (the craftsmen, the church, the aristocracy). At mid-industrial
revolution (19th century) the value-adding part (innovators plus factory
workers) had shrunk to about 50% -- with a new middle class and larger
armies and governments to support. Today the innovators and producers of
tradable goods and services is probably around 30% and, probably, still
shrinking.

Obviously, this trend can't go on forever. However, the present 70% of
non-value adders in the advanced countries with increasingly dumbed-down
jobs and with declining real, rather than nominal, wages (as of the last
three decades) then they are supplying their own solution by reducing the
number of their children. If, in the advanced countries, this 70% also
persuade their government to restrict immigration from the poor of the
world, then their populations will decline (as they are already close to
doing) and the essential value-adders of the economy will once again rise
from whatever level they will have stabilized at during the next 30 years or
so. As for the value-adders they'll have no problem in having enough
children to replenish their numbers if they want to. Even if the ladies
don't want the bother of personally producing the requisite numbers of
children -- namely about 2.1 each -- then they will certainly be able to pay
enough surrogate mothers. Also in vitro gestation might well be possible
within the next 30 years.#

Keith 

At 14:40 19/05/2011, you wrote:




>From NY Times  May 18, 2011

 

Now evidence is emerging that the damage wrought by the sour economy is more
widespread than just a few careers led astray or postponed. Even for college
graduates ­ the people who were most protected from the slings and arrows of
recession
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/r/recession_an
d_depression/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>
<https://www.readability.com/articles/xnuuaez9?legacy_bookmarklet=1#rdb-foot
note-1> 1 ­ the outlook is rather bleak. 

Employment rates for new college graduates have fallen sharply in the last
two years, as have starting salaries for those who can find work. What’s
more, only half of the jobs landed by these new graduates even require a
college degree, reviving debates about whether higher education is “worth
it” after all. 

“I have friends with the same degree as me, from a worse school, but because
of who they knew or when they happened to graduate, they’re in much better
jobs,” said Kyle Bishop, 23, a 2009 graduate of the University of Pittsburgh
who has spent the last two years waiting tables, delivering beer, working at
a bookstore and entering data. “It’s more about luck than anything else.” 

The median starting salary for students graduating from four-year colleges
in 2009 and 2010 was $27,000, down from $30,000 for those who entered the
work force in 2006 to 2008, according to a study released
<http://www.heldrich.rutgers.edu/sites/default/files/content/Work_Trends_May
_2011.pdf>
<https://www.readability.com/articles/xnuuaez9?legacy_bookmarklet=1#rdb-foot
note-2> 2 on Wednesday by the John J. Heldrich Center for Workforce
Development at Rutgers University. That is a decline of 10 percent, even
before taking inflation into account. 

Of course, these are the lucky ones ­ the graduates who found a job. Among
the members of the class of 2010, just 56 percent had held at least one job
by this spring, when the survey was conducted. That compares with 90 percent
of graduates from the classes of 2006 and 2007. (Some have gone for further
education or opted out of the labor force, while many are still pounding the
pavement.) 

Even these figures understate the damage done to these workers’ careers.
Many have taken jobs that do not make use of their skills; about only half
of recent college graduates said that their first job required a college
degree. 

The choice of major is quite important. Certain majors had better luck
finding a job that required a college degree, according to an analysis by
Andrew M. Sum, an economist at Northeastern University, of 2009 Labor
Department data for college graduates under 25. 

Young graduates who majored in education and teaching or engineering were
most likely to find a job requiring a college degree, while area studies
majors ­ those who majored in Latin American studies, for example ­ and
humanities majors were least likely to do so. Among all recent education
graduates, 71.1 percent were in jobs that required a college degree; of all
area studies majors, the share was 44.7 percent. 

An analysis by The New York Times of Labor Department data about college
graduates aged 25 to 34 found that the number of these workers employed in
food service, restaurants and bars had risen 17 percent in 2009 from 2008,
though the sample size was small. There were similar or bigger employment
increases at gas stations and fuel dealers, food and alcohol stores, and
taxi and limousine services. 

This may be a waste of a college degree, but it also displaces the
less-educated workers who would normally take these jobs. 

“The less schooling you had, the more likely you were to get thrown out of
the labor market altogether,” said Mr. Sum, noting that unemployment rates
for high school graduates and dropouts are always much higher than those for
college graduates. “There is complete displacement all the way down.” 

Meanwhile, college graduates are having trouble paying off student loan
<http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/subjects/s/student_loan
s/index.html?inline=nyt-classifier>
<https://www.readability.com/articles/xnuuaez9?legacy_bookmarklet=1#rdb-foot
note-3> 3 debt, which is at a median of $20,000 for graduates of classes
2006 to 2010. 

Mr. Bishop, the Pittsburgh graduate, said he is “terrified” of the effects
his starter jobs might have on his ultimate career, which he hopes to be in
publishing or writing. “It looks bad to have all these short-term jobs on
your résumé, but you do have to pay the bills,” he said, adding that right
now his student loan debt was over $70,000. 

Many graduates will probably take on more student debt. More than 60 percent
of those who graduated in the last five years say they will need more formal
education to be successful. 

“I knew there weren’t going to be many job prospects for me until I got my
Ph.D.,” said Travis Patterson, 23, a 2010 graduate of California State
University, Fullerton. He is working as an administrative assistant for a
property management company and studying psychology in graduate school.
While it may not have anything to do with his degree, “it helps pay my rent
and tuition, and that’s what matters.” 

Going back to school does offer the possibility of joining the labor force
when the economy is better. Unemployment rates are also generally lower for
people with advanced schooling. 

Those who do not go back to school may be on a lower-paying trajectory for
years. They start at a lower salary, and they may begin their careers with
employers that pay less on average or have less room for growth. 

“Their salary history follows them wherever they go,” said Carl Van Horn, a
labor economist at Rutgers. “It’s like a parrot on your shoulder, traveling
with you everywhere, constantly telling you ‘No, you can’t make that much
money.’ ” 

And while young people who have weathered a tough job market may shy from
risks during their careers, the best way to nullify an unlucky graduation
date is to change jobs when you can, says Till von Wachter, an economist at
Columbia. 

“If you don’t move within five years of graduating, for some reason you get
stuck where you are. That’s just an empirical finding,” Mr. von Wachter
said. “By your late 20s, you’re often married, and have a family and have a
house. You stop the active pattern of moving jobs.” 
 
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2011/05/
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to