How do you empty a civilization for a buck?   The pictures are amazing but
filled with people would be even more so.   What was lost for a Mozart
symphony or a Schubert serenade?     How many silver bells in the
processions of Seville came from these people’s dishes and trinkets?

 

http://travel.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/travel/in-peru-machu-picchu-and-its-sib
ling-incan-ruins-along-the-way.html?hpw

 

REH

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 8:47 PM
To: 'Keith Hudson'; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] study-says-technology-could-transform-society

 

Interesting comments from Mike Spencer and from Keith.    

 

Mike says he didn’t know although he lives up there around the Mic Mac who
do happen to know a lot about this.     Of course they won’t talk the way
I’m talking to you because we, on this list,  have a lot of history of
speaking to each other from a place of honesty.   (Even though I do have my
cultural break downs sometimes.)     But, our history, together on this
list,  is why I speak face to face in the way that I am.    It’s an act of
respect towards your spirit.   

 

If you want to talk with the Elder peoples, sometimes the best way is to do
as Indian people do when they want to learn something.     Go to a community
basketball game and pick the oldest grandmother you can find and ask to sit
and watch the game with them.      Wait and observe.    Gradually, if you
smell right, they will open the door.      But don’t ask questions and don’t
think your time is more important than theirs or that you are going to get
away without some kind of serious gift that you WILL miss.    Cause and
effect.    Debts are owed.    You debts can’t be passed from immigrant to
immigrant until someone forgets them.   They are remembered and will
eventually be paid either to those owed or worse, to one’s own spirit in its
ignorance of cause and effect.     I feel it an honor to open up this
history to you.   Thanks for reading and sharing Mike.

 

I feel the same way about Keith.    We are pretty rough with each other
sometimes but there is always a deep respect for the distance between our
realities and the toughness in speaking from the heart.    

 

Keith,  sometimes when I need tech support I get some guy in India trained
by an ex-colonialist professor, (or a corporation with a script,) who will
explain to me how my machine got the way that it did, and why they made it
“to be that way and fail”  and that I have no recourse other than NOT to buy
from them again.   It matters not that all of my information, from ten years
of work, was erased as a result of their company strategies.     It only
matters that their “value” was maintained.    

 

(The new branding of the “consumer as a subject of a confidence game” is the
most recent example in the metaphor that began with the “barbarians” of the
Greeks, evolved into the Irish for the English and then was brought here and
branded as the primal metaphor for the  American Indian.   American Indians
were an older people that had whole histories of culture, economics, art,
medicine and urban planning while Europe was in the Dark Ages and trying to
come up with a way to replace the Silk Road for their silk and spices in
1400.)     

 

That particular “consumer” process has returned to the US in the foreign
companies.    Now Americans from Alabama also explain to me why it happened
the way it did and implicit in the explanation is that they will do nothing
about it.    (One should remember that I learned this type of thinking from
the way people were treated on an Indian reservation by the outside world.)

 

The problem here is that their explanation is but one little sliver of the
implications of what is being spoken of.   That is “sliver”  is:  that money
has value beyond agreement and that they will do nothing to endanger that.
Paul Krugman knows that it DOESN’T  and that there is no implicit value in
anything that you don’t put there yourself.

    

Keith, European wars and history mean nothing to me except for the
Batesonian double bind that says: “ I love, and have dedicated my life to
performing and teaching the product from Europe that came about as a result
of the death of my lineage and culture.”     

 

That truth has kept me singing but not, until this July, ever allowed me to
travel to Europe.    I have a wonderful Oneida Indian  soprano who has just
begun to scratch the surface of that toxic strain that could cut her throat
as it has tried to cut mine.     It has been a wonderful Jewish Maestro
that has kept me open to the works of the spirit, even the Germans,  in the
depths of grief for how those works of Art came about.      My wonderful
young soprano will have to learn that or fail in her chosen profession.   I
will try to help.   

 

It was Albrecht Duerer who saw what was lost and what would be melted down
for base metal only for the value of commerce.  

http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/contact/text2/durerjournal
.pdf

 

What was just beginning in Europe had a history here and it had to be
destroyed, or controlled in a Vatican vault, or Spain and Italy would have
been  overwhelmed the way the Italians overwhelmed that brief Dowland and
Purcell  vocal paradise in England.    I remember when Dowland crossed the
Mississippi and made it to Oklahoma long after Clementi and Handel were a
regular part of the Oklahoma landscape.     I sang the first Thomas Campion
ever on a recital in Tulsa, in 1963.     We were enthralled just as Duerer
was by the Aztec feather paintings.     We wondered how English music and
the language, had disappeared and even more how the Germans had resisted it
to have their own in Schubert and Wolf.    I realize Cromwell and the
Puritans helped that along and set up the atmosphere for the advent of the
Italian opera with Handel in London as well as Clementi with his pianos.
Was it Mozart and Beethoven that was the German’s  musical Messiahs?    Was
Beethoven, the man “who freed music” from the Italian vice-grip?     America
is now firmly in the grip of Internationalists and has little identity
beyond old European Art, Trinkets and Trash entertainment and church music.


 

It was the law of cause and effect that set the demise of the Spaniard’s and
Italian’s  magnificent cultural achievements in the way they treated us.
Individuals always believe in their specialness and usually treat people who
are like them, but below them in power,  with contempt.     Often they
refuse to believe they were ever that way themselves.      The question that
occurs to me here is:  Did the magnificent Art and cultural achievements
that Cortez discovered at Tenochtitlan and Chichen Itza go unrecognized,
(except as base metals and trinkets,)  because it wouldn’t be until the 19th
century that Spain, or the English, had such sophistication and urban
planning as they found here in 1515?     Is that why they simply didn’t see
the need for it?    

 

The Spanish corporate urban structure for Aztec labor killed the Aztec
people by the millions from the Hanta Virus that the Mixteca had controlled
through urban planning.     The Spanish had no idea, but they would pay when
lesser diseases here returned to become killers in Spain.     Spain went
through that money like a drunk  and was soon broke but the Columbian
exchange didn’t just destroy us here.    Their  destruction is still going
on in the economic “systems of value” in the present and the refusal to
write or even acknowledge the history of economy of the pre-Columbian world
and how it worked both in business and science as well as the glue of
spirituality that tied it all together. 

 

Spain was soon returned to the bankrupt status while the Italian Church was
“absorbed” in Vienna and transformed into Heilige Kunst in Berlin, and
Leipzig.  Some of the early masters were Italian but it would not be the
Porpuras and the Cherubinis  but Bach, Sechter, Albrectsburger, Niedermeyer,
Weick and Leopold Mozart etc. who would carry the day in spite of the
magnificent efforts of Friar Martini and Antonio Salieri who never took a
dime for teaching Beethoven, Hummel, Mozart, Schubert or Moscheles.    Even
among the Italians, money wasn’t the value here, competence was.    And the
first competence was in the development of the human potentials -  not the
marketplace!   

 

It was the musically bankrupt English and Scots who turned their stories to
“wastelands”, profit, utility and pleasure as ownership of something outside
yourself.     “Useful” things that could justify theft in the colonies and
the rebranding of murder as “Collateral Damage”   in a greater market
enterprise with monetary value being the only value.      To paraphrase
DeMille’s Pharaoh in speaking of Moses’ God:   The Romany actor Yul Brynner
portraying Pharaoh  spoke the words,  “The Hebrew’s God IS God.”      Except
here it was  “To the English and Scottish Economists their money should be
God to the whole world and will!”     Money not as contract and agreement
but as the ultimate in value for all of reality.    Collateral damage began
here in the 16th century.   Today it is rebranded as “cost effectiveness”
and rules the entire market machine. 

 

I will argue that refusing to see, much less “include”,  the whole circle of
reality is not and has never been a way to discover real value.   

 

You can’t blame Islam for resisting you on this as a slap against science.
They just don’t approve of the morality that goes along with Western Science
and the idea of “Cost Effectiveness.”    That is to them a “Great Satan”
since they believe in super demons.   But so does the English church and all
of the other Christian Churches.   We don’t in super demons.    Humans are
quite demonic enough in their ordinary struggles, without the need for a
super tempter.     We believe that evil is banal.    We don’t need a great
beast, or a Leviathan for a cop out and a refusal to be fully human.    Evil
is personal.    Stalin was a jerk and Hitler was on drugs and was a jerk.
You can’t escape responsibility, you can only pay for your actions through
becoming a real person who IS responsible.     We even have a word for such
a  “real person.”   Ayvwiyah.     It is a rare businessman that qualifies as
Ayvwiyah to an Indian.     Being Ayvwiyah is about seeing the atrocities for
what they are and going on in spite of them.      The European Christian
theologian Paul Tillich called it “The Courage to be.”      

 

Having the courage to step forward into the art even when it is from a pile
of the most sacred objects, and people, being burned for the purpose of
melting down the gold to be sent away for spices and tea.

 

REH  

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 2:09 AM
To: [email protected]; RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: Re: [Futurework] study-says-technology-could-transform-society

 

Most of the "New World" silver and gold that entered Europe in the 16th and
17th centuries pretty promptly left Europe during the 17th and 18th
centuries in a vastly increased trade with India, China and the Far East in
exchange for their cottons, porcelain, silks, spices, sugar and opium (we
had little to offer them other than gold and silver). The European wars of
the 18th century (with mercenary armies rather than conscripted ones) were,
if anything, more limited than they might have been due to a shortage of
gold coinage. The wars of the 19th and 20th centuries (with increasingly
sized artillery regiments with increasing press-ganging and conscription
with much lower average soldier-pay than previous highly-paid mercenaries)
were paid for by printing money because there was insufficient gold and
silver for governments to borrow. Because governments then discovered that
money-printing was an easy way out, they have kept to it ever since. And
banks have been enthusiastic supporters of this dodge because they knew that
however much credit they created, governments would then have to print more
and more banknotes. That's why the US$ and the UK£ are worth less than 5% of
what they were pre-1914. And that's why we're in deep trouble today with no
hope of remedy until we re-establish currencies on stable platforms -- and,
furthermore, demote banks to the status of normal businesses. 

Keith

At 06:05 25/06/2011, you wrote:



Ray wrote:

     1515 when the gold from the new world began to flood Europe and
     create almost everything that we consider important today as a
     result of the pillage.  A completely new identity emerged in
     Europe with a blossoming of arts and culture in every nook and
     cranny.  I trace my teachers and can go back no further than the
     16th century.  They even call that "pre-prosperity time", the
     dark ages that opened into the Age of Enlightened genocide, rape
     and pillage.  Yes it did change Europe and lead to a century of
     carnage in the 20th century.  Hundreds of millions dead but it
     all began here with 100 million dead.  History is just history.
     You can't change it but you can understand cause and effect.

Well, let me expose my ignorance of finance here. (What, again? :-)

Europe was, AFAIUI, insulated or partitioned off from the pillage  and
genocide itself, connected only by a tenuous thread of ship, military
and attendant exploiter adventurers. The blood and misery was in place
so distant that it might seem nearly mythical.

So from the European system as a whole, money was just being created
out of thin air.  A fleet of ships filled with gold or silver bars,
even after a few were lost to (yes) Pirates of the Carribean, was so
valuable relative to the capital and operational costs (to European
monarchs and investors, if not to native Americans) that the cost was
inconsequential.

That appears to me to be approximately the equivalent of printing
money. The cost of the press is inconsquential.

In the 17th c. international bankers were getting involved and I'm
guessing that some or much of the financial stream was diverted into
loans, typically to monarchs to support armies.  I'm further guessing
that in the 16th c. that money was simply *spent* by the monarchs and
investors who sponsored the trade.

Maybe I have that somewhat wrong but the upshot seems to have been
that having free money to spread around, albeit destined for less than
praiseworthy purposes, financed a century or two of enlightenment,
increasing prosperity, improved living conditions and even maybe the
nascent rise of the middle class.

Maybe the Fed should lose the loan/debt thing and just print [for
hi-tech values of "print", of course] a lot of money and give it away
or spend it on bridges, dams, urban sewage treatment, mortage relief
and the like.  Or is that what Paul Krugman is already saying?


In ignorance,
- Mike

-- 
Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
                                                           /V\ 
[email protected]                                     /( )\
http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/
<http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A
0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0%A0>                        ^^-^^

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2011/06/
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to