Ray, in the following paragraph, you mention Weick as one person, a musician 
presumably, among others who carried the day.  Who was he or she?  Perhaps I 
have a notable ancestor I'm unaware of.  The closest I can come to a musical 
Weick is Clara Shuman whose maiden name  is usually spelled Wieck not Weick.



Ed



Spain was soon returned to the bankrupt status while the Italian Church was 
"absorbed" in Vienna and transformed into Heilige Kunst in Berlin, and Leipzig. 
 Some of the early masters were Italian but it would not be the Porpuras and 
the Cherubinis  but Bach, Sechter, Albrectsburger, Niedermeyer, Weick and 
Leopold Mozart etc. who would carry the day in spite of the magnificent efforts 
of Friar Martini and Antonio Salieri who never took a dime for teaching 
Beethoven, Hummel, Mozart, Schubert or Moscheles.    Even among the Italians, 
money wasn't the value here, competence was.    And the first competence was in 
the development of the human potentials -  not the marketplace!   

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ray Harrell 
  To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' ; 'Keith Hudson' 
  Sent: Sunday, June 26, 2011 12:44 AM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] study-says-technology-could-transform-society


  How do you empty a civilization for a buck?   The pictures are amazing but 
filled with people would be even more so.   What was lost for a Mozart symphony 
or a Schubert serenade?     How many silver bells in the processions of Seville 
came from these people's dishes and trinkets?

   

  
http://travel.nytimes.com/2011/06/26/travel/in-peru-machu-picchu-and-its-sibling-incan-ruins-along-the-way.html?hpw

   

  REH

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
  Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 8:47 PM
  To: 'Keith Hudson'; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] study-says-technology-could-transform-society

   

  Interesting comments from Mike Spencer and from Keith.    

   

  Mike says he didn't know although he lives up there around the Mic Mac who do 
happen to know a lot about this.     Of course they won't talk the way I'm 
talking to you because we, on this list,  have a lot of history of speaking to 
each other from a place of honesty.   (Even though I do have my  cultural break 
downs sometimes.)     But, our history, together on this list,  is why I speak 
face to face in the way that I am.    It's an act of respect towards your 
spirit.   

   

  If you want to talk with the Elder peoples, sometimes the best way is to do 
as Indian people do when they want to learn something.     Go to a community 
basketball game and pick the oldest grandmother you can find and ask to sit and 
watch the game with them.      Wait and observe.    Gradually, if you smell 
right, they will open the door.      But don't ask questions and don't think 
your time is more important than theirs or that you are going to get away 
without some kind of serious gift that you WILL miss.    Cause and effect.    
Debts are owed.    You debts can't be passed from immigrant to immigrant until 
someone forgets them.   They are remembered and will eventually be paid either 
to those owed or worse, to one's own spirit in its ignorance of cause and 
effect.     I feel it an honor to open up this history to you.   Thanks for 
reading and sharing Mike.

   

  I feel the same way about Keith.    We are pretty rough with each other 
sometimes but there is always a deep respect for the distance between our 
realities and the toughness in speaking from the heart.    

   

  Keith,  sometimes when I need tech support I get some guy in India trained  
by an ex-colonialist professor, (or a corporation with a script,) who will 
explain to me how my machine got the way that it did, and why they made it "to 
be that way and fail"  and that I have no recourse other than NOT to buy from 
them again.   It matters not that all of my information, from ten years of 
work, was erased as a result of their company strategies.     It only matters 
that their "value" was maintained.    

   

  (The new branding of the "consumer as a subject of a confidence game" is the 
most recent example in the metaphor that began with the "barbarians" of the 
Greeks, evolved into the Irish for the English and then was brought here and 
branded as the primal metaphor for the  American Indian.   American Indians 
were an older people that had whole histories of culture, economics, art, 
medicine and urban planning while Europe was in the Dark Ages and trying to 
come up with a way to replace the Silk Road for their silk and spices in 1400.) 
    

   

  That particular "consumer" process has returned to the US in the foreign 
companies.    Now Americans from Alabama also explain to me why it happened the 
way it did and implicit in the explanation is that they will do nothing about 
it.    (One should remember that I learned this type of thinking from the way 
people were treated on an Indian reservation by the outside world.)

   

  The problem here is that their explanation is but one little sliver of the 
implications of what is being spoken of.   That is "sliver"  is:  that money 
has value beyond agreement and that they will do nothing to endanger that.      
Paul Krugman knows that it DOESN'T  and that there is no implicit value in 
anything that you don't put there yourself.

      

  Keith, European wars and history mean nothing to me except for the Batesonian 
double bind that says: " I love, and have dedicated my life to performing and 
teaching the product from Europe that came about as a result of the death of my 
lineage and culture."     

   

  That truth has kept me singing but not, until this July, ever allowed me to 
travel to Europe.    I have a wonderful Oneida Indian  soprano who has just 
begun to scratch the surface of that toxic strain that could cut her throat as 
it has tried to cut mine.     It has been a wonderful Jewish Maestro  that has 
kept me open to the works of the spirit, even the Germans,  in the depths of 
grief for how those works of Art came about.      My wonderful young soprano 
will have to learn that or fail in her chosen profession.   I will try to help. 
  

   

  It was Albrecht Duerer who saw what was lost and what would be melted down 
for base metal only for the value of commerce.  

  
http://nationalhumanitiescenter.org/pds/amerbegin/contact/text2/durerjournal.pdf

   

  What was just beginning in Europe had a history here and it had to be 
destroyed, or controlled in a Vatican vault, or Spain and Italy would have been 
 overwhelmed the way the Italians overwhelmed that brief Dowland and Purcell  
vocal paradise in England.    I remember when Dowland crossed the Mississippi 
and made it to Oklahoma long after Clementi and Handel were a regular part of 
the Oklahoma landscape.     I sang the first Thomas Campion ever on a recital 
in Tulsa, in 1963.     We were enthralled just as Duerer was by the Aztec 
feather paintings.     We wondered how English music and the language, had 
disappeared and even more how the Germans had resisted it to have their own in 
Schubert and Wolf.    I realize Cromwell and the Puritans helped that along and 
set up the atmosphere for the advent of the Italian opera with Handel in London 
as well as Clementi with his pianos.     Was it Mozart and Beethoven that was 
the German's  musical Messiahs?    Was Beethoven, the man "who freed music" 
from the Italian vice-grip?     America is now firmly in the grip of 
Internationalists and has little identity beyond old European Art, Trinkets and 
Trash entertainment and church music.  

   

  It was the law of cause and effect that set the demise of the Spaniard's and 
Italian's  magnificent cultural achievements in the way they treated us.    
Individuals always believe in their specialness and usually treat people who 
are like them, but below them in power,  with contempt.     Often they refuse 
to believe they were ever that way themselves.      The question that occurs to 
me here is:  Did the magnificent Art and cultural achievements that Cortez 
discovered at Tenochtitlan and Chichen Itza go unrecognized, (except as base 
metals and trinkets,)  because it wouldn't be until the 19th century that 
Spain, or the English, had such sophistication and urban planning as they found 
here in 1515?     Is that why they simply didn't see the need for it?    

   

  The Spanish corporate urban structure for Aztec labor killed the Aztec people 
by the millions from the Hanta Virus that the Mixteca had controlled through 
urban planning.     The Spanish had no idea, but they would pay when lesser 
diseases here returned to become killers in Spain.     Spain went through that 
money like a drunk  and was soon broke but the Columbian exchange didn't just 
destroy us here.    Their  destruction is still going on in the economic 
"systems of value" in the present and the refusal to write or even acknowledge 
the history of economy of the pre-Columbian world and how it worked both in 
business and science as well as the glue of spirituality that tied it all 
together. 

   

  Spain was soon returned to the bankrupt status while the Italian Church was 
"absorbed" in Vienna and transformed into Heilige Kunst in Berlin, and Leipzig. 
 Some of the early masters were Italian but it would not be the Porpuras and 
the Cherubinis  but Bach, Sechter, Albrectsburger, Niedermeyer, Weick and 
Leopold Mozart etc. who would carry the day in spite of the magnificent efforts 
of Friar Martini and Antonio Salieri who never took a dime for teaching 
Beethoven, Hummel, Mozart, Schubert or Moscheles.    Even among the Italians, 
money wasn't the value here, competence was.    And the first competence was in 
the development of the human potentials -  not the marketplace!   

   

  It was the musically bankrupt English and Scots who turned their stories to 
"wastelands", profit, utility and pleasure as ownership of something outside 
yourself.     "Useful" things that could justify theft in the colonies and the 
rebranding of murder as "Collateral Damage"   in a greater market enterprise 
with monetary value being the only value.      To paraphrase DeMille's Pharaoh 
in speaking of Moses' God:   The Romany actor Yul Brynner portraying Pharaoh  
spoke the words,  "The Hebrew's God IS God."      Except here it was  "To the 
English and Scottish Economists their money should be God to the whole world 
and will!"     Money not as contract and agreement but as the ultimate in value 
for all of reality.    Collateral damage began here in the 16th century.   
Today it is rebranded as "cost effectiveness" and rules the entire market 
machine. 

   

  I will argue that refusing to see, much less "include",  the whole circle of 
reality is not and has never been a way to discover real value.   

   

  You can't blame Islam for resisting you on this as a slap against science.    
 They just don't approve of the morality that goes along with Western Science 
and the idea of "Cost Effectiveness."    That is to them a "Great Satan" since 
they believe in super demons.   But so does the English church and all of the 
other Christian Churches.   We don't in super demons.    Humans are quite 
demonic enough in their ordinary struggles, without the need for a super 
tempter.     We believe that evil is banal.    We don't need a great beast, or 
a Leviathan for a cop out and a refusal to be fully human.    Evil is personal. 
   Stalin was a jerk and Hitler was on drugs and was a jerk.     You can't 
escape responsibility, you can only pay for your actions through becoming a 
real person who IS responsible.     We even have a word for such a  "real 
person."   Ayvwiyah.     It is a rare businessman that qualifies as Ayvwiyah to 
an Indian.     Being Ayvwiyah is about seeing the atrocities for what they are 
and going on in spite of them.      The European Christian theologian Paul 
Tillich called it "The Courage to be."      

   

  Having the courage to step forward into the art even when it is from a pile 
of the most sacred objects, and people, being burned for the purpose of melting 
down the gold to be sent away for spices and tea.

   

  REH  

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
  Sent: Saturday, June 25, 2011 2:09 AM
  To: [email protected]; RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] study-says-technology-could-transform-society

   

  Most of the "New World" silver and gold that entered Europe in the 16th and 
17th centuries pretty promptly left Europe during the 17th and 18th centuries 
in a vastly increased trade with India, China and the Far East in exchange for 
their cottons, porcelain, silks, spices, sugar and opium (we had little to 
offer them other than gold and silver). The European wars of the 18th century 
(with mercenary armies rather than conscripted ones) were, if anything, more 
limited than they might have been due to a shortage of gold coinage. The wars 
of the 19th and 20th centuries (with increasingly sized artillery regiments 
with increasing press-ganging and conscription with much lower average 
soldier-pay than previous highly-paid mercenaries) were paid for by printing 
money because there was insufficient gold and silver for governments to borrow. 
Because governments then discovered that money-printing was an easy way out, 
they have kept to it ever since. And banks have been enthusiastic supporters of 
this dodge because they knew that however much credit they created, governments 
would then have to print more and more banknotes. That's why the US$ and the 
UKĀ£ are worth less than 5% of what they were pre-1914. And that's why we're in 
deep trouble today with no hope of remedy until we re-establish currencies on 
stable platforms -- and, furthermore, demote banks to the status of normal 
businesses. 

  Keith

  At 06:05 25/06/2011, you wrote:



  Ray wrote:

       1515 when the gold from the new world began to flood Europe and
       create almost everything that we consider important today as a
       result of the pillage.  A completely new identity emerged in
       Europe with a blossoming of arts and culture in every nook and
       cranny.  I trace my teachers and can go back no further than the
       16th century.  They even call that "pre-prosperity time", the
       dark ages that opened into the Age of Enlightened genocide, rape
       and pillage.  Yes it did change Europe and lead to a century of
       carnage in the 20th century.  Hundreds of millions dead but it
       all began here with 100 million dead.  History is just history.
       You can't change it but you can understand cause and effect.

  Well, let me expose my ignorance of finance here. (What, again? :-)

  Europe was, AFAIUI, insulated or partitioned off from the pillage  and
  genocide itself, connected only by a tenuous thread of ship, military
  and attendant exploiter adventurers. The blood and misery was in place
  so distant that it might seem nearly mythical.

  So from the European system as a whole, money was just being created
  out of thin air.  A fleet of ships filled with gold or silver bars,
  even after a few were lost to (yes) Pirates of the Carribean, was so
  valuable relative to the capital and operational costs (to European
  monarchs and investors, if not to native Americans) that the cost was
  inconsequential.

  That appears to me to be approximately the equivalent of printing
  money. The cost of the press is inconsquential.

  In the 17th c. international bankers were getting involved and I'm
  guessing that some or much of the financial stream was diverted into
  loans, typically to monarchs to support armies.  I'm further guessing
  that in the 16th c. that money was simply *spent* by the monarchs and
  investors who sponsored the trade.

  Maybe I have that somewhat wrong but the upshot seems to have been
  that having free money to spread around, albeit destined for less than
  praiseworthy purposes, financed a century or two of enlightenment,
  increasing prosperity, improved living conditions and even maybe the
  nascent rise of the middle class.

  Maybe the Fed should lose the loan/debt thing and just print [for
  hi-tech values of "print", of course] a lot of money and give it away
  or spend it on bridges, dams, urban sewage treatment, mortage relief
  and the like.  Or is that what Paul Krugman is already saying?


  In ignorance,
  - Mike

  -- 
  Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
                                                             /V\ 
  [email protected]                                     /( )\
  http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                       ^^-^^

  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

  Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/2011/06/
    



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to