CONFERENCE BOARD OF CANADA
      
     
     

 RSS   Share   Printer friendly   Subscribe to Portfolio e-mail

     

Rich Canadians Are Getting Richer
www.conferenceboard.ca

OTTAWA, July 13, 2011 /CNW/ - The richest group of Canadians increased their 
share of total national income while poor and middle-income individuals lost 
ground since 1993, according to The Conference Board of Canada's How Canada 
Performs analysis of income 
inequality(http://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/hot-topics/canInequality.aspx). 
Even though income levels for the poorest group of Canadians also rose, albeit 
minimally, the gap between the rich and poor in Canada widened.

"While the poor are minimally better off in an absolute sense, they are 
significantly worse off in a relative sense," said Anne Golden, President and 
CEO of the Conference Board. "High inequality raises two questions. First, what 
is the impact on the economic well-being of a country? The answer is that high 
inequality can diminish economic growth if it means that the country is not 
fully using the skills and capabilities of all its citizens or if it undermines 
social cohesion, leading to increased social tensions. Second, high inequality 
raises a moral question about fairness and social justice."

The average Canadian is better off than he or she was a generation ago. In 
1976, average income was $51,100; by 2009 it was $59,700-an increase of 17 per 
cent over 33 years, after adjusting for inflation. But average income does not 
necessarily reflect how the majority of people are doing; instead, some 
analysts suggest using median income-the income level that divides the group 
into two equal parts. Median income grew by only 5.5 per cent over the same 
period.

The most commonly used measure of income inequality is the Gini index, which 
calculates how the distribution of income among individuals within a country 
deviates from an exactly equal distribution (a Gini index of 0 means that every 
person in the society has the same amount of income; whereas, 1 would indicate 
that one person has all the income).

Canada's 2009 Gini index (0.32) means that 32 per cent of Canada's national 
income would need to be redistributed in order to have a country that was 
completely equal in terms of income.

The pattern (http://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/hot-topics/canInequality#table1) 
of inequality growth throughout the past three decades has been uneven.Canada 
made significant progress in reducing inequality in the 1980s, with the Gini 
index reaching a low of 0.28 in 1989. Income inequality rose in the 1990s, but 
Canada's Gini index remained around 0.32 in the 2000s.

Canada is not alone among its peers in experiencing an increase in income 
inequality. Global inequality is rising and most of Canada's peer countries 
have also experienced rising inequality. But rising inequality among developed 
countries is not inevitable. For example, Austria (0.265) and Denmark (0.232) 
have lower income inequality, as measured by the Gini coefficient, with incomes 
per capita nearly equivalent to that of Canada.

The average income level of the poorest group of people in Canada 
increased-after taxes and transfers and after adjusting for inflation-but only 
marginally, from $12,400 in 1976 to $14,500 in 2009. However, the gap between 
the real average income of the richest group (the top quintile) of Canadians 
and the poorest group (the lowest quintile) grew from $92,300 in 1976 to 
$117,500 in 2009.

Between 2000 and 2009, every province with the exception of Ontario reduced its 
share of the population living in low income. Recent data, however, indicates 
that income inequality rose during and after the recession. Between 2007 and 
2009, seven out of ten provinces experienced a rise in their low-income rates - 
Prince Edward Island, Saskatchewan, and New Brunswick are the exceptions. The 
largest jump occurred in Alberta, where the low-income rate rose from 6.6 per 
cent to 9.9 per cent.

Another worrisome trend is the rise in elderly poverty since the mid-1990s, 
following 20 years of dramatic reductions. The biggest jump occurred in the 
group of elderly women. Between 2006 and 2009, nearly 128,000 more seniors were 
said to be living in low income, of whom 70 per cent were women.

How Canada Performs (http://www.conferenceboard.ca/hcp/default.aspx) is a 
multi-year research program at The Conference Board of Canada to help leaders 
identify relative strengths and weaknesses in Canada's socio-economic 
performance. The How Canada Performs website presents data and analysis on 
Canada's performance compared to 16 peer countries in six performance 
categories: Economy, Innovation, Environment, Education and Skills, Health, and 
Society. This year, the Conference Board is assessing Canada's performance on 
10 Hot Topics. 





For further information:
Brent Dowdall, Media Relations, Tel.: 613- 526-3090 ext.  448
E-mail: [email protected]



<<cboc-e.gif>>

<<spacer.gif>>

<<rss.gif>>

<<share.gif>>

<<print.gif>>

<<portfolio-email.gif>>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to