OK, now I'm pretty sure it's individual income that the CB is referring to.  
Another point: It gives the 1976 income ($51,000) as having been adjusted for 
inflation.  Using the Bank of Canada Inflation Calculator, had it not been 
adjusted, i.e. left in 1976 terms, the value would have been shown as 
$13,739.32.  Just kind of shows you what inflation has done to our money.

Ed 

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ed Weick 
  To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION 
  Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 3:26 PM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] Conference Board on income disparity


  From what I've been able to access, it looks like it's individual income.

  Ed
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Ed Weick 
    To: [email protected] ; RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME 
DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION 
    Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:45 PM
    Subject: Re: [Futurework] Conference Board on income disparity


    I also wondered about the individual versus family thing.  I may try to 
access the report.

    Ed


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: "Mike Spencer" <[email protected]>
    To: <[email protected]>
    Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2011 2:25 PM
    Subject: [Futurework] Re: Conference Board on income disparity


    > 
    > 
    >> The average Canadian is better off than he or she was a generation
    >> ago. In 1976, average income was $51,100; by 2009 it was $59,700-an
    >> increase of 17 per cent over 33 years, after adjusting for
    >> inflation.
    > 
    > Is that family income or individual salary/wage income?  If the
    > former, any increase in the average may be due to an increase in
    > number of dual-income families.  Not a big win.  IIRC, dual-income was
    > not the typical or default case in 1976.
    > 
    >> But average income does not necessarily reflect how the majority of
    >> people are doing; ...
    > 
    > Just so.  
    > 
    >> ...instead, some analysts suggest using median
    >> income-the income level that divides the group into two equal
    >> parts. Median income grew by only 5.5 per cent over the same period.
    > 
    > Same question: family or individual? And it's still tricky.  Median
    > ticks upward if below-median people get raises to above-median or new
    > above-median jobs are created.  Not, though, if the few at the top
    > just get their already big incomes tripled.
    > 
    > But what do I know?
    > - Mike
    > 
    > -- 
    > Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
    >                                                           /V\ 
    > [email protected]                                     /( )\
    > http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^
    > _______________________________________________
    > Futurework mailing list
    > [email protected]
    > https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
    > 


----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    Futurework mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to