Ooops!  I meant to say Democracy is the end of Capitalism, but probably not.
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ed Weick 
  To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION 
  Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 4:15 PM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] Bernanke speaking because Obama can't?


  Or perhaps it's the other way around: Capitalism is the end of democracy?  I 
guess it depends on what we mean by either word.

  Ed
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: Ray Harrell 
    To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' 
    Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 1:39 PM
    Subject: Re: [Futurework] Bernanke speaking because Obama can't?


    The end of Democracy is Capitalism?

     

    REH

     

    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
    Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 12:09 PM
    To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
    Subject: Re: [Futurework] Bernanke speaking because Obama can't?

     

    Having got the international economies into a mess, it seems that some sort 
of over all control will have to be exercised to try to clean up the mess.  
Business as usual doesn't seem to offer much hope.

     

    arthur

     

    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
    Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 11:53 AM
    To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
    Subject: Re: [Futurework] Bernanke speaking because Obama can't?

     

    Are you saying that what we need now is a benevolent despot ala the Banana 
Republics and Hugo Chavez but smarter?

     

    REH

     

    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
    Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 10:34 AM
    To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
    Subject: Re: [Futurework] Bernanke speaking because Obama can't?

     

    I notice that various national and international leaders are moving away 
from calming words to more crisis language.  I saw this last week, when I was 
struck by the open near catastrophic language.   In retrospect I think this was 
to scare people to action.

     

    I think that this is part of a program to prepare people for a "long haul" 
and more importantly to get certain govts to go along with actions that would 
have otherwise been unthinkable.  Witness Merkle's ability to get a decision to 
support bailouts.  Bernanke is turning up the volume to get Republicans to move 
away from ideology and move toward action, however ineffective the action may 
ultimately be.

     

    arthur

     

    From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
    Sent: Thursday, September 29, 2011 9:30 AM
    To: [email protected]
    Subject: [Futurework] Bernanke speaking because Obama can't?

     

    From today's Globe and Mail.

     

    Ed

     

     

    Long-term unemployment in U.S. a 'national crisis,' Bernanke says
     
    MARTIN CRUTSINGER
    WASHINGTON- The Associated Press
    Published Wednesday, Sep. 28, 2011 9:21PM EDT
    Last updated Wednesday, Sep. 28, 2011 9:37PM EDT

     

    In unusually strong language directed at U.S. politicians, Federal Reserve 
Chairman Ben Bernanke has called long-term unemployment a "national crisis" and 
suggested Congress needs to act on jobs and the housing industry.

    Mr. Bernanke noted that about 45 per cent of the unemployed have been out 
of work for at least six months.

    "This has never happened in the post-war period in the United States. They 
are losing the skills they had, they are losing their connections, their 
attachment to the labour force."

    He added: "The unemployment situation we have, the job situation, is really 
a national crisis."

    Mr. Bernanke said the government needs to provide support to help the 
long-term unemployed retrain for jobs and find work. And he suggested that 
Congress should take more responsibility.

    Responding to a question, Mr. Bernanke said long-term unemployment, 
budgetary discipline and housing policy were the three most important areas 
where Congress could contribute to an economic recovery.

    "There are certainly some areas where other policy makers could 
contribute," he said.

    Mr. Bernanke's comments were his latest in a public effort to get Congress 
to act further to rejuvenate the economy. He suggested that the Fed can achieve 
only so much through policies that seek to lower long-term interest rates.

    "The Federal Reserve has made enormous efforts to try to help this economy 
recover and stabilize" through its control of interest rates, or monetary 
policy, he said. Those policies have driven rates to record lows.

    "Monetary policy can do a lot, but monetary policy is not a panacea," Mr. 
Bernanke said.

    On the housing crisis, he said strong government programs to help the 
industry recover would aid the Fed's own efforts to boost housing by driving 
mortgage rates to their lowest levels in decades.

    In his speech, the central banker said the United States and other rich 
nations could relearn a few lessons from fast-growing developing nations.

    He said the successful emerging economies such as China had adopted 
disciplined budget policies, embraced free trade, made public investments and 
supported education.

    "Advanced economies like the United States would do well to relearn some of 
the lessons from the experiences of the emerging market economies, such as the 
importance of disciplined fiscal policies," Mr. Bernanke said.

    But in the question-and-answer period, Mr. Bernanke cautioned U.S. 
lawmakers against cutting deficits too quickly to reduce budget deficits. He 
has said that could put the fragile economy at risk.

    He noted in his speech that emerging markets such as China account for a 
large and growing share of the global economy, so they need to act accordingly.

    "With increasing size and influence comes greater responsibility," he said.

    Emerging nations will be challenged in the future by their reliance on 
exports to drive growth, he added.

    The Obama administration has been pushing the Group of 20 major economies, 
which includes traditional powers such as the United States and emerging 
economies such as China, Brazil and India, to boost domestic demand rather than 
relying so heavily on exports to rich nations.



----------------------------------------------------------------------------


    _______________________________________________
    Futurework mailing list
    [email protected]
    https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to