Ray: The problem is still the design of large generic systems that benefit the 
entire planet and not just a small group.    What's so hard about that?

Me: It's been tried, Ray, many, many times, but it just doesn't seem to happen. 
 For some reason, enlightened ideas always seem to lead to crumbling utopias.  
The idealism of Marx, Engels et. al. somehow led to the brutality of Stalinist 
Russia and, more recently, to the state capitalism of China.  Adam Smith, the 
Classical Economists, the Austrians and the Chicago School were brilliant 
economic thinkers, but their thought has been used, perverted perhaps, to 
support a system in which the few are very rich and the  many are mired in 
poverty and degradation.  International agencies established for the greater 
good of all humanity -- the UN, the IMF, the World Bank, etc. -- are made to 
serve particular interests or are shoved into corners from which they are 
unable to serve anybody with any effect.

I don't know what can be done about it.  Religion perhaps, though not the kind 
that makes people throw their hands in the air, shout halleluiah and ask some 
grand pseudo-being to help them keep doing what they're doing, but the kind 
that builds a morality that brings people together and tells them that they 
must not cheat their fellow-man or use him to boost their own advantages.

Could it happen?  Will it?  I'm a pessimist, but I won't abandon hope.

Ed

  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Ray Harrell 
  To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' ; 
[email protected] 
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 11:19 AM
  Subject: Re: [Futurework] Where it's at.


  What is it about economists that they can ignore the basic system of 
capitalism that separates wealth to small groups at the expense of the larger 
group?   What is happening now is the normal thing for capitalism.   What 
capitalism needs is balance by other domains of society to curb it's 
immorality.  When capitalism buys the society or kills the intellect of the 
society through mere sensual object relations and the refusal to teach the 
young then the society withers.   The problem is still the design of large 
generic systems that benefit the entire planet and not just a small group.    
What's so hard about that?

   

   

  REH

   

  From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ed Weick
  Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2011 8:22 AM
  To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME 
DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
  Subject: [Futurework] Where it's at.

   

  For a thorough posting on the state of the American economy and the causes of 
the present crisis, look at:

   

  
http://www.businessinsider.com/what-wall-street-protesters-are-so-angry-about-2011-10?op=1

   

  Is it accurate?  I don't know, but it is very interesting.

   

  Ed



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to