More contrarian perspectives on Hitchens...

M

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sid 
Shniad
Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:29 AM
Subject: Freedom Rider: Christopher Hitchens, White Man | Black Agenda Report


http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man

[image: Black Agenda Report]

------------------------------
*12/21/2011*
Freedom Rider: Christopher Hitchens, White Man

*by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley*

There was nothing witty, cute, or endearing about the late Christopher 
Hitchens, a racist to the core whose association with the Left served only to 
discredit it. “Beneath his mutterings against ‘Islamofascism’ he was 
nothing more than an angry white guy who wanted brown people to be conquered or 
dead.” A man of many prejudices but no real loyalties or principles, he 
flowed with the money. “Why toil away as a left winger known only within that 
smaller group, when more money and media attention awaited a cheer leader for 
pax Americana and white supremacy?”



“*In the end all his words amounted to nothing more than fighting for the 
rights of white people to control everyone else in the world.”*

The British born writer Christopher Hitchens died of cancer last week. The 
outpouring of grief and praise for a man who can only be called a propagandist 
for barbaric ideologies may seem curious at first glance, but there is an ugly 
and logical explanation for the reaction.

Mr. Hitchens was for many years known as a leftist, a self-described 
Trotskyite. He wrote a column in *The Nation* magazine during that time, and 
was known for excoriating the likes of Henry Kissinger for the carnage he 
carried out in Vietnam and Southeast Asia that killed millions of people..

In more recent years Hitchens took a sharp turn in his writings and public 
statements and in the process became far more famous, and no doubt a lot 
richer. After the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, 
Hitchens came out of the closet and presented himself to the world as a full 
blown neo-con, an unconditional supporter of the Bush administration’s 
aggressions. So great was his love for the Bushites that he took the 
citizenship oath in a naturalization ceremony presided over by Homeland 
Security chief Michael Chertoff.

Hitchens became a favorite of pundits, and with a body of prolific work and 
glib statements in the media, he was rarely out of the spotlight. Yet in the 
end all his words amounted to nothing more than fighting for the rights of 
white people to control everyone else in the world.* *

“*Hitchens came out of the closet and presented himself to the world as a 
full blown neo-con, an unconditional supporter of the Bush administration’s
aggressions.”*

Hitchens’ descent into support for western imperialism was, as George 
Galloway put it, a metamorphosis “from butterfly back into slug,” but it 
wasn’t as sudden as it seemed. Like most criminals, Hitchens showed his true 
side earlier on. In 1992 he was invited to attend a protest opposing the 
quincentenary celebration of Columbus’ arrival in the western hemisphere. 
Hitchens made it clear that he was not at all put off by the genocide of 
Indians and enslavement of Africans. As *he put 
it<http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3737110.html>
[3]*, "1492 was a very good year and deserves to be celebrated with great vim 
and gusto." According to him, the coming of the European and the barbarity 
which ensued is just the way things happen, and in fact all for the betterment 
of humankind.

“But those who view the history of North America as a narrative of genocide 
and slavery are, it seems to me, hopelessly stuck on this reactionary position. 
They can think of the Western expansion of the United States only in terms of 
plague blankets, bootleg booze and dead buffalo, never in terms of the medicine 
chest, the wheel and the railway . . . But it does happen to be the way that 
history is made, and to complain about it is as empty as complaint about 
climatic, geological or tectonic shift.”

In other words, it is part of the natural order of the universe for the world 
and its people to be under the rule of whites, with people of color preferably 
under their control whenever possible.

The political ascension of George W. Bush and the beginning of the war on 
terror was all the opening that Hitchens, a leftist poseur, needed. Why toil 
away as a left winger known only within that smaller group, when more money and 
media attention awaited a cheer leader for pax Americana and white supremacy?

“*Once again we see that the endless aggression is not really opposed by most 
Americans, and they prove it by lionizing the likes of the late
Hitchens.”*

His fans may argue with the assessment, calling his unqualified support of the 
Iraq occupation a “mistake,” when it was no such thing. Hitchens decided to 
make a living, a very good one, as a professional white man. Beneath his 
mutterings against “Islamofascism” he was nothing more than an angry white 
guy who wanted brown people to be conquered or dead.

The liberals who swooned over his British accent and his media savvy may not 
want to admit it, but they also admired his openly imperialist and indeed 
racist point of view. He claimed to be sickened by Saddam Hussein’s tyranny, 
but what he really wanted was for the Arabs to be subservient, in no position 
to question or to oppose the powerful white-run nations of the west. As for 
tyranny, if people who looked like him were carrying it out, it wasn’t so bad 
after all.

The bizarre levels of admiration on display for this man are symptomatic of a 
much larger problem. Once again we see that the endless aggression is not 
really opposed by most Americans, and they prove it by lionizing the likes of 
the late Hitchens. They too think that powerful white people have the right to 
lay waste to entire regions of the world and to the human beings within them. 
In fact, they don’t think that non-white people are really human beings with 
the rights they assume for themselves.

Hitchens may have been in the minority in publicly proclaiming the rightness of 
mass murder but that doesn’t mean he was alone. Now that he has passed away, 
it is clear that his ideas were loved by many people, who also hearken back to 
a time when white was openly declared right, and with ample doses of “vim and 
gusto” too.

*Margaret Kimberley's Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR, and is widely 
reprinted elsewhere. She maintains a frequently updated blog as well as at 
**http://freedomrider.blogspot.com.<http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/>
[4]* *Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at 
Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgandaReport.com*.

   - Christopher Hitchens 
racist<http://blackagendareport.com/category/media-media-justice-and-media-reform/christopher-hitchens-racist>

 ------------------------------
*Source URL:* 
http://blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man

*Links:*
[1] 
http://blackagendareport.com/category/media-media-justice-and-media-reform/christopher-hitchens-racist
[2] 
http://blackagendareport.com/sites/www.blackagendareport.com/files/christopher_hitchens.jpg
[3] http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3737110.html
[4] http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/
[5] 
http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man&amp;linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man&linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man>


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to