That wasn't true for me. I just thought that in general he was a bore who traded on his accent. He was predictable and interesting only in death when he was brave not to join the idolatrous God pack. I will give him the benefit of the doubt that he wasn't just choosing very short term gain that he was broke and needed to work right up to the end to pay his debts and support his family.
I thought his handling of a lot of stuff from Clinton's private life to the Iraq war was amateurish and provincial. The sex stuff was a diversion that made many of us have to defend Clinton when he was doing things, like Obama doing things, that run counter to our beliefs about the good of the Nation. NAFTA, repeal of regulations, banking rules and the abandonment of the poor. Hitchens and the others that focused on private life and supported the Republicans "parental diversion" in opening the impeachment door made it impossible for us to do anything than defend Clinton just as is happening now again with Bonehead and the others. As for Hitchens, I rarely read him because once I got his formula, he didn't deviate much and so there was no point. He reminded me of the Neo-cons that I personally knew long before Hitchens came on the scene. People in the 1970s who I've given enough print time to already on this list. What's embarrassing is that those people were musicians and some other artists and that their limitation politically translated directly into their ability not to complete the art and so we all suffered for that because they had power that could have made a better aesthetic life for the nation but they squandered it. As for Hitchens, he was tone deaf in more than one way and this is all I will say about him ever. My condolences to his family. Enough! I'm sick of it. REH -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 9:31 AM To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION' Subject: Re: [Futurework] [Ottawadissenters] FW: Freedom Rider: ChristopherHitchens, White Man | Black Agenda Report I think it’s the change from "our side" to the "other side" that irks some. It is that change that makes him interesting. Lots of boring folks choose a team and stick with that team for the rest of their lives rationalizing as they go along. arthur -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of michael gurstein Sent: Thursday, December 22, 2011 2:15 AM To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION'; [email protected] Subject: RE: [Futurework] [Ottawadissenters] FW: Freedom Rider: ChristopherHitchens, White Man | Black Agenda Report I agree with Keith (and Margaret)... Hitchens was a rather specific upper middle class Brit public school oxbridge type ... Who affected a critical/radical position the way some folks in college smoke pipes or wear ascots... His gift of the gab and rather plummy accent wowed the colonial rubes... When the appropriate time came he changed his position without a heyho like some folks change socks and not incidentally got his grab at the brass errr...gold ring without even having to give up his public/self image as a bit of roue... His last days were something of a redemption... But we aren't really talking about that. M -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 5:12 PM To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION' Subject: Re: [Futurework] [Ottawadissenters] FW: Freedom Rider: ChristopherHitchens, White Man | Black Agenda Report Whatever we say about Hitchens I think the following is apropos "To go against the dominant thinking of your friends, of most of the people you see every day, is perhaps the most difficult act of heroism you can perform." (Theodore H. White) -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of michael gurstein Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 2:56 PM To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK,INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'; [email protected] Subject: [Ottawadissenters] FW: Freedom Rider: Christopher His tchens, White Man | Black Agenda Report More contrarian perspectives on Hitchens... M -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Sid Shniad Sent: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 11:29 AM Subject: Freedom Rider: Christopher Hitchens, White Man | Black Agenda Report http://www.blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man [image: Black Agenda Report] ------------------------------ *12/21/2011* Freedom Rider: Christopher Hitchens, White Man *by BAR editor and senior columnist Margaret Kimberley* There was nothing witty, cute, or endearing about the late Christopher Hitchens, a racist to the core whose association with the Left served only to discredit it. “Beneath his mutterings against ‘Islamofascism’ he was nothing more than an angry white guy who wanted brown people to be conquered or dead.†A man of many prejudices but no real loyalties or principles, he flowed with the money. “Why toil away as a left winger known only within that smaller group, when more money and media attention awaited a cheer leader for pax Americana and white supremacy?†“*In the end all his words amounted to nothing more than fighting for the rights of white people to control everyone else in the world.â€* The British born writer Christopher Hitchens died of cancer last week. The outpouring of grief and praise for a man who can only be called a propagandist for barbaric ideologies may seem curious at first glance, but there is an ugly and logical explanation for the reaction. Mr. Hitchens was for many years known as a leftist, a self-described Trotskyite. He wrote a column in *The Nation* magazine during that time, and was known for excoriating the likes of Henry Kissinger for the carnage he carried out in Vietnam and Southeast Asia that killed millions of people.. In more recent years Hitchens took a sharp turn in his writings and public statements and in the process became far more famous, and no doubt a lot richer. After the September 11, 2001 attacks on New York and Washington, Hitchens came out of the closet and presented himself to the world as a full blown neo-con, an unconditional supporter of the Bush administration’s aggressions. So great was his love for the Bushites that he took the citizenship oath in a naturalization ceremony presided over by Homeland Security chief Michael Chertoff. Hitchens became a favorite of pundits, and with a body of prolific work and glib statements in the media, he was rarely out of the spotlight. Yet in the end all his words amounted to nothing more than fighting for the rights of white people to control everyone else in the world.* * “*Hitchens came out of the closet and presented himself to the world as a full blown neo-con, an unconditional supporter of the Bush administration’s aggressions.â€* Hitchens’ descent into support for western imperialism was, as George Galloway put it, a metamorphosis “from butterfly back into slug,†but it wasn’t as sudden as it seemed. Like most criminals, Hitchens showed his true side earlier on. In 1992 he was invited to attend a protest opposing the quincentenary celebration of Columbus’ arrival in the western hemisphere. Hitchens made it clear that he was not at all put off by the genocide of Indians and enslavement of Africans. As *he put it<http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3737110.html> [3]*, "1492 was a very good year and deserves to be celebrated with great vim and gusto." According to him, the coming of the European and the barbarity which ensued is just the way things happen, and in fact all for the betterment of humankind. “But those who view the history of North America as a narrative of genocide and slavery are, it seems to me, hopelessly stuck on this reactionary position. They can think of the Western expansion of the United States only in terms of plague blankets, bootleg booze and dead buffalo, never in terms of the medicine chest, the wheel and the railway . . . But it does happen to be the way that history is made, and to complain about it is as empty as complaint about climatic, geological or tectonic shift.†In other words, it is part of the natural order of the universe for the world and its people to be under the rule of whites, with people of color preferably under their control whenever possible. The political ascension of George W. Bush and the beginning of the war on terror was all the opening that Hitchens, a leftist poseur, needed. Why toil away as a left winger known only within that smaller group, when more money and media attention awaited a cheer leader for pax Americana and white supremacy? “*Once again we see that the endless aggression is not really opposed by most Americans, and they prove it by lionizing the likes of the late Hitchens.â€* His fans may argue with the assessment, calling his unqualified support of the Iraq occupation a “mistake,†when it was no such thing. Hitchens decided to make a living, a very good one, as a professional white man. Beneath his mutterings against “Islamofascism†he was nothing more than an angry white guy who wanted brown people to be conquered or dead. The liberals who swooned over his British accent and his media savvy may not want to admit it, but they also admired his openly imperialist and indeed racist point of view. He claimed to be sickened by Saddam Hussein’s tyranny, but what he really wanted was for the Arabs to be subservient, in no position to question or to oppose the powerful white-run nations of the west. As for tyranny, if people who looked like him were carrying it out, it wasn’t so bad after all. The bizarre levels of admiration on display for this man are symptomatic of a much larger problem. Once again we see that the endless aggression is not really opposed by most Americans, and they prove it by lionizing the likes of the late Hitchens. They too think that powerful white people have the right to lay waste to entire regions of the world and to the human beings within them. In fact, they don’t think that non-white people are really human beings with the rights they assume for themselves. Hitchens may have been in the minority in publicly proclaiming the rightness of mass murder but that doesn’t mean he was alone. Now that he has passed away, it is clear that his ideas were loved by many people, who also hearken back to a time when white was openly declared right, and with ample doses of “vim and gusto†too. *Margaret Kimberley's Freedom Rider column appears weekly in BAR, and is widely reprinted elsewhere. She maintains a frequently updated blog as well as at **http://freedomrider.blogspot.com.<http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/> [4]* *Ms. Kimberley lives in New York City, and can be reached via e-Mail at Margaret.Kimberley(at)BlackAgandaReport.com*. - Christopher Hitchens racist<http://blackagendareport.com/category/media-media-justice-and-media-reform/christopher-hitchens-racist> ------------------------------ *Source URL:* http://blackagendareport.com/content/freedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man *Links:* [1] http://blackagendareport.com/category/media-media-justice-and-media-reform/christopher-hitchens-racist [2] http://blackagendareport.com/sites/www.blackagendareport.com/files/christopher_hitchens.jpg [3] http://www.abc.net.au/unleashed/3737110.html [4] http://freedomrider.blogspot.com/ [5] http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man&linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man<http://www.addtoany.com/share_save?linkurl=http%3A%2F%2Fblackagendareport.com%2Fcontent%2Ffreedom-rider-christopher-hitchens-white-man&linkname=Freedom%20Rider%3A%20Christopher%20Hitchens%2C%20White%20Man> ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Ottawadissenters/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: [email protected] [email protected] <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [email protected] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [email protected] https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
