Ray, 

I sent this to another list with some fairly senior Google folks... We'll
see if there is any response.

I think it is arguable that email is now what might be classified as both a
utility http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Public+Utilities and
an "essential service" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essential_services and
would, I believe under certain circumstances (war for example) be treated as
such by governments.  What that implies to me at least, is that there is the
need for regulation to ensure a minimum level of service and service
standards including in this instance a minimally acceptable and usable
"help" function.

M

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ray Harrell
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2012 10:57 PM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Mike Gursteinis presentlydealing with an email
nightmare and so is offlinefor now


Sorry that you are having to go through this but your thinking is clarifying
things for me.   I like the "regulating a utility."    I wonder if the US
will ever get around to doing that with Fedex? 

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of michael gurstein
Sent: Tuesday, February 28, 2012 12:36 AM
To: 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Mike Gurstein is presentlydealing with an email
nightmare and so is offline for now

I'm still not recovered... So sending this from a back-up account--notably a
community network (as per Mike S.'s preferred model) that I at one time used
as my primary account but which I gave up for the siren song of gmail :(.
The Vancouver Community Network has been providing volunteer based, free
email service for about 15 years or so and has done it reliably and with
remarkably little downtime or system failure. Also, they are very responsive
and just down the road (I've been on their Board off and on for years...
(There is I think a significant message there as well...

At one level my issues with gmail are consumer protection issues -- which
however, since they seem to be transnational it is hard to see who/how I can
invoke these (but I could be wrong...

But at a deeper level I think it is not simply about protecting the consumer
but regulating a utility... My guess is that if we asked virtually any
population in the world the appropriate set of questions the result would be
that they experience email not as a "consumer good" but rather as a
necessary element of their day to day infrastructure as a citizen, consumer,
business operator, parent etc.etc. And that any significant disruption would
be experienced in more or less the same manner as a disruption in any other
significant utility/infrastructure of modern life...

It is I think, only a matter of time before this is widely recognized
politically and some sort of regulatory environment established--it is
probably only delayed because of the speed of evolution of the tech, the
technological illiteracy of most politicians (among the last groups in the
world to move into the email enabled world--according to studies in various
countries), and the difficulty of transnational regulation and the absence
of a framework through which such regulation could be introduced and
managed.

Those who reference PEBKAC (i.e. blaming the victim) (as is implicit in Mike
S.'s comments)--this is ridiculous... I'm reasonably
well-educated/informed/intelligent... I made best efforts as indicated in my
blog post and I found myself in gmail hell (where I still reside BTW... I've
been searching around in gmail "help" and found many other people--some who
appear rather more technically literate than myself similarly lost somewhere
in the antechamber of Kafka's Castle/trying to communicate with the Borg
(HAL?).. and from various comments and my blog and particularly private
emails many many other people have similar problems... when a problem
because sufficiently common it moves from being the victims problem to being
the originators' problem or at least it should...

And as various other people have noted gmail is not a "free" (as in
benevolent) service... getting people to gmail--which Google has and
continues to aggressively attempt to do is part of their business model
where they take the information which folks using their mail service gives
them access to and they then sell that (at very considerable profit) to
various folks with an interest.

Best,

Mike

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 10:09 PM
To: [email protected]; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,
EDUCATION'
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Mike Gurstein is presently dealing with an email
nightmare and so is offline for now

Well said.  A sober reflection on the way in which entrust valuable
information to unseen business people.  

You are saying shop local.  For food and computer support.

Arthur


-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Saturday, February 25, 2012 6:57 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Re: Mike Gurstein is presently dealing with an email
nightmare and so is offline for now


GMail is, you know, cool and convenient and all like that.
But if your career depends on reliable email (which is intrinsically
unreliable), you should become an instant email control freak.

  + Your mail server -- the physical machine -- should be
    located within easy driving distance of your principal
    place of abode or business.

  + It should be operated and maintained by a human whom you
    have met face to face and whose name and reliable
    contact info you know, probably a small- or medium-sized
    business owner or a tech manager or system administrator
    for same.

  + That machine and that individual should be contracted to
    maintain frequent periodic backups of your email archive
    and provide you with timely access, direct or indirect,
    to those backups in a way that is not impossibly
    technical or time-consuming. If your career can be
    totally crashed by mail archive loss, those backups
    should also include off-site backup and possibly
    (depending on how tempting a target you are) encryption.

  + Direct personal support, at least 8/5 -- better 24/7 --
    from your mail server admin or his technically competent
    employees or colleagues should be part of your contract.

  + You should have your own redundant periodic backups
    (what if your server establishment burns down?) on DVD,
    a second machine, a home server, a portable HD or other
    means. Off-site is desirable, that is, if your house
    burns down, your friend, relative or neighborhood techie
    has your box of DVDs in his attic or your backup HD in
    his desktop machine.

  + And yes, you should expect to pay for all this.  This is
    your career, right?  It's an essential business expense.
    Imagine a "free" ATM service run by ACME-Google.  All
    you have to do is watch a 2-minute video each time you
    use it.  Would you keep all your money in such a
    service?

After all the talk on FW about the nature of the modern corporation in all
its maleficent aspects, I can't imagine trusting my career, income,
fiduciary (or other) responsibilities to the whim of a large^H^H^H^H^H giant
corporation which has no binding contractual obligations to me.

That said, Mike, I wish you all the best in getting things working again.

- Mike

-- 
Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
                                                           /V\ 
[email protected]                                     /( )\
http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to