I think you got this wrong Natalia.    This is not the religious right wing
although it is probably businessmen like Bloomberg in New York.   The issue
is probably liability and they don't want to bother.     It may even be
cheaper to buy the food than to police rotten food being donated.    People
can yell at bureaucrats but if your homeless and your child dies from
dysentery from donated food, they are still dead.    The problem here is
which is cost effective and which is just feel good.    NYCity sent the
"feel gooders" who came to donate time after 9/11 home.    The reason became
apparent when so many professionals doing the work still came down with
exotic cancers etc.    I have mixed feeling about Bloomberg but Romney
scares me to death.   

 

REH

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of D & N
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2012 3:30 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: [Futurework] feeding homeless becoming illegal in US cities

 

I've noticed that the saying "what would Jesus do?" has fallen out of favour
with the religious right--I guess because it's terribly inconvenient and
often inadvertently reveals them in a bad light. Bad government policy
outcomes seem to manifest inconveniently through indigents, therefore
dispersing them or starving them out is now the trend. Corporations need a
seemingly prosperous place to conduct trade. If only the Tea Party could see
this infringement on individuals' rights as another reason to dissolve
government, rather than an essential punitive measure!

Natalia



http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/feeding-the-homeless-banned-in-m
ajor-cities-all-over-america


Feeding The Homeless BANNED In


Major Cities All Over America 

What would you do if you came across someone on the street that had not had
anything to eat for several days?  Would you give that person some food?
Well, the next time you get that impulse you might want to check if it is
still legal to feed the homeless where you live.  Sadly, feeding the
homeless has been banned in major cities all over America.  Other cities
that have not banned it outright have put so many requirements on those that
want to feed the homeless (acquiring expensive permits, taking food
preparation courses, etc.) that feeding the homeless has become "out of
reach" for most average people.  Some cities are doing these things because
they are concerned about the "health risks" of the food being distributed by
ordinary "do-gooders".  Other cities are passing these laws because they do
not want homeless people congregating in city centers where they know that
they will be fed.  But at a time when poverty and government dependence are
soaring to unprecedented levels
<http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-u-s-economy-soul-crushing-t
otal-system-failure> , is it really a good idea to ban people from helping
those that are hurting?

This is just another example that shows that our country is being taken over
by control freaks.  There seems to be this idea out there that it is the job
of the government to take care of everyone and that nobody else should even
try.

But do we really want to have a nation where you have to get the permission
of the government before you do good to your fellow man?

It isn't as if the government has "rescued" these homeless people.  Homeless
shelters all over the nation are turning people away each night because they
have no more room.  There are many homeless people that are lucky just to
make it through each night alive during the winter.

Sometimes a well-timed sandwich or a cup of warm soup can make a world of
difference for a homeless person.  But many U.S. cities have decided that
feeding the homeless is such a threat that they had better devote law
enforcement resources to making sure that it doesn't happen.

This is so twisted.  In America today, you need a "permit" to do almost
anything.  We are supposed to be a land of liberty and freedom, but these
days government bureaucrats have turned our rights into "privileges" that
they can revoke at any time.

The following are some of the major U.S. cities that have attempted to ban
feeding the homeless....

Philadelphia

Mayor Nutter recently banned feeding homeless people in many parts of
Philadelphia where homeless people are known to congregate
<http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/03/14/nutter-announces-ban-on-outdoor
-feeding-of-homeless/> ....

Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter has announced a ban on the feeding of
large numbers of homeless and hungry people at sites on and near the
Benjamin Franklin Parkway.

Mayor Nutter is imposing the ban on all outdoor feedings of large numbers of
people on city parkland, including Love Park and the Ben Franklin Parkway,
where it is not uncommon for outreach groups to offer free food.

Nutter says the feedings lack both sanitary conditions and dignity.

Orlando

Last June, a group of activists down in Orlando, Florida were arrested by
police for feeding the homeless in defiance of a city ordinance
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/10/orlando-food-not-bombs-arrests_n_8
74840.html> ....

Over the past week, twelve members of food activist group Food Not Bombs
have been arrested in Orlando for giving free food to groups of homeless
people in a downtown park. They were acting in defiance of a controversial
city ordinance that mandates permits for groups distributing food to large
groups in parks within two miles of City Hall. Each group is allowed only
two permits per park per year; Food Not Bombs has already exceeded their
limit. They set up their meatless buffet in Lake Eola knowing that they
would likely be arrested as a result.

Houston

Down in Houston, a group of Christians was recently banned from distributing
food to the homeless, and they were told that they probably would not be
granted a permit to do so in the future even if they applied for one
<http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Houston-permit-rule-stops-c
ouple-s-effort-to-feed-1611603.php> ....

Bobby and Amanda Herring spent more than a year providing food to homeless
people in downtown Houston every day. They fed them, left behind no trash
and doled out warm meals peacefully without a single crime being committed,
Bobby Herring said.

That ended two weeks ago when the city shut down their "Feed a Friend"
effort for lack of a permit. And city officials say the couple most likely
will not be able to obtain one.

"We don't really know what they want, we just think that they don't want us
down there feeding people," said Bobby Herring, a Christian rapper who goes
by the stage name Tre9.

Dallas

Dallas has also adopted a law which greatly restricts the ability of
individuals and ministries to feed the homeless
<http://blog.chron.com/believeitornot/2011/11/homeless-ministry-says-dallas-
food-ordinance-restricts-their-religious-freedom/> ....

A Dallas-area ministry is suing the city over a food ordinance that
restricts the group from giving meals to the homeless.

Courts dismissed Dallas' request for a summary judgment last week, saying
the case, brought up by pastor Don Hart (in video above) may indeed be a
violation of free exercise of religion, as protected by the Texas Religious
Freedom Restoration Act, the blog Religion Clause reported.

In the court filing, the ministry leaders argue that their Christian faith
requires them to share meals with the homeless (Jesus did!) and that the
requirement that even churches and charities provide toilets, sinks, trained
staff and consent of the city keeps them from doing so.

Las Vegas

A few years ago, Las Vegas became the first major U.S. city to specifically
pass a law banning the feeding of homeless people
<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/28/us/28homeless.html?pagewanted=all> ....

Las Vegas, whose homeless population has doubled in the past decade to about
12,000 people in and around the city, joins several other cities across the
country that have adopted or considered ordinances limiting the distribution
of charitable meals in parks. Most have restricted the time and place of
such handouts, hoping to discourage homeless people from congregating and,
in the view of officials, ruining efforts to beautify downtowns and
neighborhoods.

But the Las Vegas ordinance is believed to be the first to explicitly make
it an offense to feed "the indigent."

That law has since been blocked by a federal judge
<http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-03-26-homeless-laws_N.htm> , and
since then many U.S. cities have been very careful not to mention "the
indigent" or "the homeless" by name in the laws they pass that are intended
to ban feeding the homeless.

New York City

New York City has banned all food donations to government-run homeless
shelters because the bureaucrats there are concerned that the donated food
will not be "nutritious" enough.

Yes, this is really true.

The following is from a recent Fox News article
<http://nation.foxnews.com/michael-bloomberg/2012/03/19/nanny-bloomberg-bans
-food-donations-homeless-shelters-too-salty> ....

The Bloomberg administration is now taking the term "food police" to new
depths, blocking food donations to all government-run facilities that serve
the city's homeless.

In conjunction with a mayoral task force and the Health Department, the
Department of Homeless Services recently started enforcing new nutritional
rules for food served at city shelters. Since DHS can't assess the
nutritional content of donated food, shelters have to turn away good
Samaritans.

Can you believe that?

The bureaucrats are officially out of control.

In America today, it seems like almost everything is illegal
<http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/19-signs-that-america-has-become-
a-crazy-control-freak-nation-where-almost-everything-is-illegal> .

One church down in Louisiana was recently ordered to stop giving out water
<http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/church-ordered-to-stop-giv
ing-away-free-water.html>  because it did not have a government permit.

Well, I don't know about you, but I sure am going to give a cup of cold
water to someone if they need it whether I have a permit or not.

It is as if common sense has totally gone out the window in this nation.

Over in New Hampshire, a woman is being sued
<http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/03/19/nh-woman-sued-for-planting-flowers-in
-her-front-yard/>  for planting flowers in her own front yard.

This is the kind of thing that makes me glad that I have moved to a much
more rural location.  People in the country tend to be much more relaxed.

Sadly, those that love to micro-manage others continue to get the upper hand
in America.  Back in January, 40,000 new laws
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45819570/ns/us_news-life/t/new-laws-toughen-rul
es-abortions-immigrants-voters/#.T01odvVXk3w>  went into effect all over
America.  The politicians continue to hit us with wave after wave of
regulations and laws with no end in sight.

All of this is making America a very unpleasant place in which to live.

 

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to