I think you got this wrong Natalia. This is not the religious right
wing although it is probably businessmen like Bloomberg in New York.
The issue is probably liability and they don't want to bother. It
may even be cheaper to buy the food than to police rotten food being
donated. People can yell at bureaucrats but if your homeless and
your child dies from dysentery from donated food, they are still
dead. The problem here is which is cost effective and which is just
feel good. NYCity sent the "feel gooders" who came to donate time
after 9/11 home. The reason became apparent when so many
professionals doing the work still came down with exotic cancers
etc. I have mixed feeling about Bloomberg but Romney scares me to
death.
REH
*From:*[email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *D & N
*Sent:* Tuesday, March 27, 2012 3:30 PM
*To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
*Subject:* [Futurework] feeding homeless becoming illegal in US cities
I've noticed that the saying "what would Jesus do?" has fallen out of
favour with the religious right--I guess because it's terribly
inconvenient and often inadvertently reveals them in a bad light. Bad
government policy outcomes seem to manifest inconveniently through
indigents, therefore dispersing them or starving them out is now the
trend. Corporations need a seemingly prosperous place to conduct
trade. If only the Tea Party could see this infringement on
individuals' rights as another reason to dissolve government, rather
than an essential punitive measure!
*Natalia*
http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/feeding-the-homeless-banned-in-major-cities-all-over-america
Feeding The Homeless BANNED In
Major Cities All Over America
What would you do if you came across someone on the street that had
not had anything to eat for several days? Would you give that person
some food? Well, the next time you get that impulse you might want to
check if it is still legal to feed the homeless where you live.
Sadly, feeding the homeless has been banned in major cities all over
America. Other cities that have not banned it outright have put so
many requirements on those that want to feed the homeless (acquiring
expensive permits, taking food preparation courses, etc.) that feeding
the homeless has become "out of reach" for most average people. Some
cities are doing these things because they are concerned about the
"health risks" of the food being distributed by ordinary
"do-gooders". Other cities are passing these laws because they do not
want homeless people congregating in city centers where they know that
they will be fed. But at a time when poverty and government
dependence are soaring to unprecedented levels
<http://theeconomiccollapseblog.com/archives/the-u-s-economy-soul-crushing-total-system-failure>,
is it really a good idea to ban people from helping those that are
hurting?
This is just another example that shows that our country is being
taken over by control freaks. There seems to be this idea out there
that it is the job of the government to take care of everyone and that
nobody else should even try.
But do we really want to have a nation where you have to get the
permission of the government before you do good to your fellow man?
It isn't as if the government has "rescued" these homeless people.
Homeless shelters all over the nation are turning people away each
night because they have no more room. There are many homeless people
that are lucky just to make it through each night alive during the winter.
Sometimes a well-timed sandwich or a cup of warm soup can make a world
of difference for a homeless person. But many U.S. cities have
decided that feeding the homeless is such a threat that they had
better devote law enforcement resources to making sure that it doesn't
happen.
This is so twisted. In America today, you need a "permit" to do
almost anything. We are supposed to be a land of liberty and freedom,
but these days government bureaucrats have turned our rights into
"privileges" that they can revoke at any time.
The following are some of the major U.S. cities that have attempted to
ban feeding the homeless....
*Philadelphia*
Mayor Nutter recently banned feeding homeless people in many parts of
Philadelphia where homeless people are known to congregate
<http://philadelphia.cbslocal.com/2012/03/14/nutter-announces-ban-on-outdoor-feeding-of-homeless/>....
/Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter has announced a ban on the
feeding of large numbers of homeless and hungry people at sites on
and near the Benjamin Franklin Parkway./
/Mayor Nutter is imposing the ban on all outdoor feedings of large
numbers of people on city parkland, including Love Park and the
Ben Franklin Parkway, where it is not uncommon for outreach groups
to offer free food./
/Nutter says the feedings lack both sanitary conditions and dignity./
*Orlando*
Last June, a group of activists down in Orlando, Florida were arrested
by police for feeding the homeless in defiance of a city ordinance
<http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/10/orlando-food-not-bombs-arrests_n_874840.html>....
/Over the past week, twelve members of food activist group Food
Not Bombs have been arrested in Orlando for giving free food to
groups of homeless people in a downtown park. They were acting in
defiance of a controversial city ordinance that mandates permits
for groups distributing food to large groups in parks within two
miles of City Hall. Each group is allowed only two permits per
park per year; Food Not Bombs has already exceeded their limit.
They set up their meatless buffet in Lake Eola knowing that they
would likely be arrested as a result./
*Houston*
Down in Houston, a group of Christians was recently banned from
distributing food to the homeless, and they were told that they
probably would not be granted a permit to do so in the future even if
they applied for one
<http://www.chron.com/news/houston-texas/article/Houston-permit-rule-stops-couple-s-effort-to-feed-1611603.php>....
/Bobby and Amanda Herring spent more than a year providing food to
homeless people in downtown Houston every day. They fed them, left
behind no trash and doled out warm meals peacefully without a
single crime being committed, Bobby Herring said./
/That ended two weeks ago when the city shut down their "Feed a
Friend" effort for lack of a permit. And city officials say the
couple most likely will not be able to obtain one./
/"We don't really know what they want, we just think that they
don't want us down there feeding people," said Bobby Herring, a
Christian rapper who goes by the stage name Tre9./
*Dallas*
Dallas has also adopted a law which greatly restricts the ability of
individuals and ministries to feed the homeless
<http://blog.chron.com/believeitornot/2011/11/homeless-ministry-says-dallas-food-ordinance-restricts-their-religious-freedom/>....
/A Dallas-area ministry is suing the city over a food ordinance
that restricts the group from giving meals to the homeless./
/Courts dismissed Dallas' request for a summary judgment last
week, saying the case, brought up by pastor Don Hart (in video
above) may indeed be a violation of free exercise of religion, as
protected by the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act, the blog
Religion Clause reported./
/In the court filing, the ministry leaders argue that their
Christian faith requires them to share meals with the homeless
(Jesus did!) and that the requirement that even churches and
charities provide toilets, sinks, trained staff and consent of the
city keeps them from doing so./
*Las Vegas*
A few years ago, Las Vegas became the first major U.S. city to
specifically pass a law banning the feeding of homeless people
<http://www.nytimes.com/2006/07/28/us/28homeless.html?pagewanted=all>....
/Las Vegas, whose homeless population has doubled in the past
decade to about 12,000 people in and around the city, joins
several other cities across the country that have adopted or
considered ordinances limiting the distribution of charitable
meals in parks. Most have restricted the time and place of such
handouts, hoping to discourage homeless people from congregating
and, in the view of officials, ruining efforts to beautify
downtowns and neighborhoods./
/But the Las Vegas ordinance is believed to be the first to
explicitly make it an offense to feed "the indigent."/
That law has since been blocked by a federal judge
<http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-03-26-homeless-laws_N.htm>,
and since then many U.S. cities have been very careful not to mention
"the indigent" or "the homeless" by name in the laws they pass that
are intended to ban feeding the homeless.
*New York City*
New York City has banned all food donations to government-run homeless
shelters because the bureaucrats there are concerned that the donated
food will not be "nutritious" enough.
Yes, this is really true.
The following is from a recent Fox News article
<http://nation.foxnews.com/michael-bloomberg/2012/03/19/nanny-bloomberg-bans-food-donations-homeless-shelters-too-salty>....
/The Bloomberg administration is now taking the term "food police"
to new depths, blocking food donations to all government-run
facilities that serve the city's homeless./
/In conjunction with a mayoral task force and the Health
Department, the Department of Homeless Services recently started
enforcing new nutritional rules for food served at city shelters.
Since DHS can't assess the nutritional content of donated food,
shelters have to turn away good Samaritans./
Can you believe that?
The bureaucrats are officially out of control.
In America today, it seems like almost everything is illegal
<http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/19-signs-that-america-has-become-a-crazy-control-freak-nation-where-almost-everything-is-illegal>.
One church down in Louisiana was recently ordered to stop giving out
water
<http://radio.foxnews.com/toddstarnes/top-stories/church-ordered-to-stop-giving-away-free-water.html>
because it did not have a government permit.
Well, I don't know about you, but I sure am going to give a cup of
cold water to someone if they need it whether I have a permit or not.
It is as if common sense has totally gone out the window in this nation.
Over in New Hampshire, a woman is being sued
<http://boston.cbslocal.com/2012/03/19/nh-woman-sued-for-planting-flowers-in-her-front-yard/>
for planting flowers in her own front yard.
This is the kind of thing that makes me glad that I have moved to a
much more rural location. People in the country tend to be much more
relaxed.
Sadly, those that love to micro-manage others continue to get the
upper hand in America. Back in January, 40,000 new laws
<http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/45819570/ns/us_news-life/t/new-laws-toughen-rules-abortions-immigrants-voters/#.T01odvVXk3w>
went into effect all over America. The politicians continue to hit us
with wave after wave of regulations and laws with no end in sight.
All of this is making America a very unpleasant place in which to live.
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
