An example
to a further degree
why forestry
should be curtailed
here in BC

D.


On 12/05/2012 6:46 AM, Arthur Cordell wrote:

Perhaps tourism reflects a desire to escape if only for a moment the known dark-side of our own societies, to bathe superficially in the delights of foreign societies, unscathed by the hidden realities of /their/ dark-sides.

=============

Agree. Tourism as consumption activity. A form of entertainment, escapism.

arthur

*From:*[email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *de Bivort Lawrence
*Sent:* Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:44 AM
*To:* RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
*Subject:* Re: [Futurework] The ONLY solution

Some of the affection we North Americans readily feel for Europe -- its 'quaint' villages; the corner grocer and baker; and age-old churches; the mossy street-edges; the perfect meadows; sweet-smelling hay and straw barns; the morning washing of the side-walks; the one-step-down restaurants with their old wood beams and zinc bars; the 'gruss gott' and 'bonjour, madame' among strangers; the manicured trails inter-lacing the alps; wild strawberries in the woods; the cheeses; the family-style back-street museums of the towns -- is made possible by a social system that lies hidden to tourists' eyes and that North Americans seem to shy away from when they run into its echoes here in America.

This social system is founded upon a close-knit social unit -- the village or, in towns, the neighborhood.

To Americans, this social system or what they see and experience of it seems nosy, controlling, rigid, exclusive of strangers, tradition-bound, conformist, deeply conservative, arrogantly self-confidant, and suspicious. What we Americans don't quite see, either, is how alienated are some of the youth growing up in such rigid social environments, and how some dream from an early age of escaping, typically to the nearest large town, where they can find some degree of liberty through anonymity and experiment-friendly social sub-groups of peers and happenstance mentors.

This dream of escape is fueled by knowledge of the rest of the world and of how others live, a dream accelerated to them in recent decades by television and the distribution of foreign movies down into the smallest villages, and by tourists who unthinkingly carry with them the societal 'virus' of the social mores of America, mores based on notions of the primacy of the individual; the dispensability of enduring social ties and respect for elders; and the intrinsic value of innovation and spontaneity.

And, sometimes in turn, these mores spawn societal consequences that can horrify Europeans when they visit American lands where these mores developed and flourished: garbage strewn streets; noisy and disrespectful gangs of children in the malls; the all-consuming consumerism and materialism; the thin veneer of classical education; linguistic incompetence; a propensity for violence; the substitution of 'style' for art; the substitution of self-promotion for a good reputation earned over the years through solid accomplishment and reliability; and a willingness to screw others and, if caught, move on anonymously.

Perhaps tourism reflects a desire to escape if only for a moment the known dark-side of our own societies, to bathe superficially in the delights of foreign societies, unscathed by the hidden realities of /their/ dark-sides.

Cheers,

Lawry

On May 12, 2012, at 2:13 AM, pete wrote:





On Fri, 11 May 2012, Ray Harrell wrote:


The old Cherokee Nation was the size of the modern state of Oklahoma

    and Oklahoma is the size of modern France.


No, it's not. We did this before, just a little while ago:

"No no, it is Texas that's the size of France, Oklahoma is a quarter
that size, and fits between Greece and Belarus, but with a population of
order of a small balkan state."

And while Germany is indeed about twice the size of Wisconsin, it is
also about 6% smaller than Montana, its closest US match, and thus about
half the size of France, as Monana is half the size of Texas.

-Pete (compulsive geography geek)

PS By the way, did you get a view of the land while flying over? What
I've noticed is that the small villages and small farms make a beautiful
environment, by comparison with the vast and for me rather desolate
stretches of unpopulated farmland in north america, dominated by the
impersonal geometry of the "section" - square mile divisions of farm
properties. The little scattered villages and irreguilar farm boundaries
of Europe look far more friendly, I don't think I'd mind living anywhere
among them...



Thanks Keith.   I always enjoy your thinking although I often don't agree.

    The root of the disagreement could be about geography.   This
    summer I took

    my first trip to Europe ever.   I always had an image of Europe as
    a place

    consonant with its Art and the impact of its Art on the rest of
    the world.

    Just as the first Americans to go to China with Nixon and to find
    the sheer

    stunning numbers of people overwhelming or my experience of moving
    to NYCity

    and finding the weight of the buildings, their size and immense
    number to be

    beyond my experience, the trip to Europe was different.

    I was struck by the smallness and local feeling of all of Europe.
        The

    low buildings, small transportation systems and of course the
    great beauty.

    Yes the Art is there and it is unbelievable in its sheer amounts
    and scope.

    There are big airports but basically I was struck by important
    cities with

    airports not much bigger than Oklahoma City except Oklahoma City then

    spreads over 100 miles of prairie from the airport.     The airport at

    Florence was like a mid size American city airport.     The road
    systems run

    through beautiful countrysides but essentially everything is in
    miniature.

    The old Cherokee Nation was the size of the modern state of
    Oklahoma and

    Oklahoma is the size of modern France.      Germany is the size of two

    Wisconsins and Britain is....... well..... an island after all is
    said and

    done.

    In the countries where miniature geography houses large mono racial

    populations and serious modern economies it makes sense that
    evolution would

    begin to downsize due to the sheer minimalism of the gene pool.

    Multi-culturalism is a threat to their personal gene pool and
    identity.

    Some of these groups struggle to maintain their identity through inner

    marriage in the culture but these same cultures maintaining their
    identity

    here,  suffer from serious health issues as they do elsewhere in
    the world

    and the problem is old blood.     I suspect that all of the new Muslim

    immigrants  in Europe is a genetic cry for fresh blood just as the
    American

    Indian Nations here used to raid their neighbors for wives and
    children to

    keep the gene pool, within the clan systems, viable.     I know that

    Europeans who immigrate here often speak of the liberty of
    anonymity because

    of the sheer space.    I've heard the same from immigrants to Canada.

    They love the Art and the look of their home culture but when they
    buy a

    house there they suffer from a personal kind of claustrophobia and
    a loss of

    identity which the crystallize in the word "liberty."

    REH

    From: [email protected]
    <mailto:[email protected]>

    [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith
    Hudson

    Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 3:09 AM

    To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, , EDUCATION

    Subject: [Futurework] The ONLY solution

    Never before -- in the 200,000 year history of mankind -- have
    populations

    decided to go extinct. But that is exactly what might happen in
    more than a

    score of advanced countries in Europe. By deciding to spend their
    incomes on

    the full standard kit of consumer goods, services and leisure
    experiences

    rather than two (increasingly expensive) children per woman,
    populations

    will go into steep decline once the present crop of excessively
    old people

    dies off.

    Whether European countries will completely re-stock their numbers
    in the

    years to come by continuing to encourage the poor of Asia, Africa
    and the

    Middle East to immigrate remains to be seen. For the last 30 or 40
    years,

    this has been the surreptitious policy of senior politicians and civil

    servants in order to maintain a sufficiently large taxation base. But

    whether they'll continue to get away with it remains to be seen.
    Even while

    indigenous populations are declining, they may also decide to
    elect extreme

    right-wing governments or even old-fashioned dictatorships which will

    finally erect efficient barriers. If this happens, then, at some
    future

    stage, European adults might decide to have more children and thus
    stabilize

    their populations (albeit at much smaller numbers than today).

    Stabilization of populations would only occur, however, when the
    twin trends

    of ever-increasing automation and ever-increasing growth of
    specialized

    skills balance up. That is, when the size of the consumer market
    matches up

    with the necessary jobs which provide the market with desirable
    goods and

    services, and maintain the basic infrastructure. This is the natural

    equilibrium of what has occurred during, say, 190,000 years of our

    existence. During the most recent 10,000 years of our agricultural and

    industrial eras, this self-balancing act has only been interrupted
    for brief

    periods by mass warfare.

    Sooner or later, the poor of mankind -- such as they might exist
    -- will

    begin to reach a European standard of living and go through the same

    balancing process as we are now starting. Of course, the whole of
    mankind

    might be wiped out by an unforeseen asteroid or a killer virus
    that will

    have such a long gestation period that it will be undetectable
    even as it

    spreads around. But, unlike Martin Rees, Astronomer Royal, Master
    of Trinity

    College Cambridge and past President of the Royal Society, who
    doesn't give

    us more than a century's future existence, I remain optimistic. I
    believe we

    have at least a few centuries yet until we reach the only possible
    solution.

    Keith

    Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com

    <http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/>

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework



_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to