You just have to learn to talk to and listen to the Anihiyvtaqwatlosgi.
The Thunder Beings.   I hear they are getting really pissed over what the
two leggeds are doing these days. 

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Saturday, June 30, 2012 11:32 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Re: Science held hostage in climate debate


Steve Kurtz wrote (forwarded via Arthur):

> http://afr.com/p/lifestyle/review/science_held_hostage_in_climate_Uamw
> gc7zXE
> sU6RbQJ5MWIJ

> Uncertainty is key.

The author make the point that uncertainty is the key element in the real
science -- the real efforts to deduce or infer how climate works and whither
(if anyplace determinate) it is trending.

But he also opines:

    But the real worry with climate research is that it is on the very
    edge of what is called postmodern science. This is a counterpart of
    the relativist world of postmodern art and design.  It is a much more
    dangerous beast, whose results are valid only in the context of
    society's beliefs and where the very existence of scientific
    truth can be denied.  Postmodern science envisages a sort of political
    nirvana in which scientific theory and results can be consciously and
    legitimately manipulated to suit either the dictates of political
    correctness or the policies of the government of the day.

Such postmodernist quasi-science was ridiculed in Alan Sokal's
"Transgressing the Boundaries: Towards a Transformative Hermeneutics of
Quantum Gravity". (q.g.)

It's long been an object of my curiosity how people in the upper levels of
traditional power structure can bear to live with science.
Traditionally, one is not guilty (liable, divorced, whatever) until the
judge pronounces. [1] In that moment, one becomes guilty (liable, divorced,
whatever).  The word *is* the thing.  Truth descends unequivocally from
authority.  A promise, an oath, an absolution, an acknowledgment of
paternity -- all traditionally create truth & reality when spoken.  To the
kind of individual steeped in the notions of law and authority, to a whole
class of such people, science is anathema.  Science rejects, for the most
part, absolutely certain truths but claims the right, in turn, to reject
authoritarian pronouncements on the grounds of contrary observational
evidence.

What a happy day for authoritarian personalities, whether religious or
secular, when whole domains of science come to depend on uncertain data and
statistical concepts of dubious applicability.  Next stop, postmodern
quasi-science, "valid only in the context of society's beliefs and where the
very existence of scientific truth can be denied."

On a different, if parallel line,

    From the social and economic side of things, one might take much
    more notice of the global warming scare campaign if it were not so
    obvious that many of its most vociferous supporters have other
    agendas.

And that isn't even an *attempt* at science.  It uses real science, bogus
science, history, bogus history, real or bogus what-have-you to implement an
agenda which, were it to be presented straightforwardly, would meet with
resistance, outrage or worse.  The famous sentence from the PNAC paper, 

   "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings
   revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some
   catastrophic and catalyzing event -- like a new Pearl Harbor."

has become a byword for concealing an unsavory and unmarketable agenda
behind public fear.  It appears that similar people are presently tooling up
to something similar, scare mongering the threat of "cyberwar" to conceal
the agenda of "total information awareness" and surveillance.


- Mike

-- 

[1] Someone (I forget whether it was on this list or elsewhere) rather
    condescendingly replied to my mention of truth conventionally
    emerging, ab ova as it were, from the pronouncement of a judge, with
    words to the effect that "We have juries in our country."
    Obviously irrelevant to the concept.  Truth from the word of a
    jury is no different than truth from the word of a priest or
    judge.


_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to