Until a better way is found we need one House or the other to govern in some
fashion.  The alternative might be worse than what either House has to
offer.

 

arthu

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2012 11:22 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, , EDUCATION
Subject: [Futurework] A Plague on Both Houses

 

The rapidly accumulating evidence of the modern human sciences is now
telling us with increasing clarity that the fundamental assumptions of both
left- and right-politics are fallacious. Even the wonders of a "mixed
economy" or a "third way" -- as individually promoted by both Labour and
Conservative prime ministers in this country in the last 20 years -- have
proved to be risible. Differences of poverty, opportunity and political
power remain much the same as always in any advanced country whatever type
of government, sometimes slightly reducing when great effort and spending is
made under a socialist government, more usually expanding when eyes are
taken off the ball in so-called free-enterprise government..

The whole debate can be reduced to a simple example in which the
observations, large-scale surveys and lab researches of educationalists,
psychologists, anthropologists, neuroscientists, geneticists and
evolutionary biologists are all in almost total agreement. It is that, at
the time of puberty, the adolescent is the recipient of his or her
personality and potential skills. He or she is hardly at all the creator of
those specifications. The individual has had very little to do with laying
down those specifications nor, apart from luck, the way that those
specifications subsequently play themselves out and largely determine the
experiences and happiness in the remainder of his or her lifetime.

Excluding the luck of a lottery draw or inheriting a million from an unknown
relative, there are three main lucks in life. They're all interlinked but
are sufficiently different in their effects that they can be discussed
separately. The first is the emotional, informational and cultural
environments mainly imparted by parents but also influenced by
school-teachers in the early years of childhood. By the age of puberty, any
social or intellectual skills not laid down by then will never be fully
recoverable in later life, no matter how hard one tries. 

The second luck is the nature and abilities of one's post-puberty peer group
to whom the individual now devotes much more attention as, together, they
approach adulthood. It is in this period that the individual can now develop
and enhance the comparative advantage of his or her best skills, testing
them against others in the peer group and finding a role within it. As the
prospect of adult life draws closer, friends made in this period are usually
friends for life.

The third luck is the nature and abilities of, usually, just one or two
patrons (often one's parents) who have a sufficient span of like social
contacts which enable a young adult to finally find an initial lodgement in
an adult group which, to a greater or lesser extent, is normally protective
of entry by any young hopeful. This third luck also includes the size of the
income made available in a particular group, or the intrinsic interest of a
job, and also whether that particular specialization continues to be
favoured by the changing economic environment.

To summarize: 

1. Unless a socialist government interferes in the intimate family life of
every child from his or her earliest months and years in the hope of
equalizing opportunities then inequalities of personalities and abilities
are broadly set by the age of puberty. No amount of good intent by
governments can change this.

2. A right-wing government cannot make claims of virtue for its apparent
heroes.  Those individuals are the product of good luck just as an African
child working and dying in a diamond or gold mine is the product of bad
luck.

Politics is already in a bad way. It's not likely to get any better in the
coming years as we try to work off the immense private, corporate and
governmental debts that the policies of both left-wing and right-wing
governments have lumbered us with. The modern human sciences are telling us
quite radical things about what we really are like. The new politics will
probably be concerned with how power can be confined within groups -- where
it is more accessible to be pulled down if necessary -- rather than between
groups as now.  I can take this no further. For now, until the findings of
the human sciences spread around for a generation or two, I would join the
refrain of an increasing number of the young. It's not very constructive,
I'm afraid: A Plague on Both Houses!

Keith



Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/> 
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to