I think that I mentioned this some time ago but at an OECD meeting I
happened to attend (on measuring the Internet economy) I was informed that
"voluntary" i.e. non-monetized (think for example Open Source) contributions
to the development and operaton of the Internet are not included in GDP
figures.  Rough calculations I made with some colleagues also attending that
event were that historically "voluntary" contributions to the development of
the Internet probably represented at least 50% of the overall activity (up
to the popularization of the web in about 1996 or so and a not insignificant
proportion from then forward (probably much more significant for non-US
economies given the dominant role of the US in much of Internet economic
activity.

 

This would suggest that GDP figures are in many instances almost completely
out of whack with  (some sort of) reality and are deeply flawed as a basis
for economic or social policy.

 

M

 

From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Arthur Cordell
Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 3:52 PM
To: 'Keith Hudson'; 'RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, , EDUCATION'
Subject: Re: [Futurework] Arthur's 5th belief

 

IT creates many external benefits.  These are not reflected in GDP.  We are
wealthier, because of these benefits, than the current accounts show.  With
a bit tax we can monetize the benefits which will show up in GDP and
therefore more clearly reflect the workings of a digital economy.

 

Agreed that it might cramp the ability to spend by consumers as prices rise
to reflect the added tax.   But the added revenues can be spent by
governments on a range of social services or other things that govts choose,
or can be used to reduce personal income taxes.  How the revenues are spent
becomes a political decision.

 

arthur 

 

From: Keith Hudson [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 9:33 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, , EDUCATION; Arthur Cordell
Subject: RE: [Futurework] Arthur's 5th belief

 

At 02:04 17/08/2012, you wrote:

A bit tax is an indirect tax, like the gasoline tax, and collecting it
doesn't increase govt debt.
 
arthur


It doesn't matter that it's an indirect tax, it still adds onto the total
tax that a government is able to tax without cramping the wealth producing
part of the economy. A bit tax would have the same effect as Gordon Brown's
"stealth" taxes (during the last 8 years of the 12-year Labour government).
His taxes were well-nigh invisible and apparently of little consequence but
they added up to higher government debt at the end of his term than before
it. 

Keith 



 
From: [email protected] [
mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> ] On Behalf Of Keith Hudson
Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2012 8:42 PM
To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION
Subject: [Futurework] Arthur's 5th belief
 
At 21:17 15/08/2012, Arthur wrote:

        5. That money will be found (from a bit tax, a tobin tax, some other
form of turnover indirect tax) to provide a basic income, or to provide
spending for some other type of workfare activivities in the third sector.

A consensus of the evidence from all existing advanced Western nation-states
(particularly from high-welfare Nordic countries) is that total government
taxation of around 40/45% of GDP is as much as governments can manage
without stumbling into deep debt. Some countries are beyond any possibility
of redeeming that debt already (e.g. Japan, Greece, Hungary, Ukraine) and
others are now reaching the very edge of possible redemption by means of
austerity for many years (e.g. Spain, Portugal, UK, Italy, US). All others
are at various stages in between with only a few governments  (e.g. Finland,
Germany) with a chance of reducing their debts. Even the latter might not be
able to afford basic incomes or workfare schemes.

Keith


Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/> 
  

Keith Hudson, Saltford, England http://allisstatus.wordpress.com
<http://allisstatus.wordpress.com/> 
  

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to