Am working on End of semester tests at the moment but will be happy to speak
on the opera as soon as I get over mustering up my crankiness. 

REH

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Mike Spencer
Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2012 11:46 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Futurework] Re: Thoughts on the golden age


Keith wrote:

> All the arts were at their zenith around a century ago when they'd all 
> become pretty fully developed technologies after centuries of 
> brilliant endeavours by creative geniuses.

One might even say that most art since, oh, say, since Dada, has constituted
ironic references to all the art that has gone before.
Even the photorealist school might be seen as an ironic reference to the
centuries long pursuit by painters from the 16th c. (13th c.?) onwards to
capture on canvas the realism that photography mastered at a stroke and
offered straight out of the can.

I know next to nothing about opera [1].  What's the state of opera in the
last 100 years, Ray?  The only newish one I've heard even part of is Glass's
Akhnaton.[2]  How does that fit into the tradition of opera?
Creative? Ironic reference? Dada? Shingled off onto the fog?

> The only exception to all this is architecture, which is still 
> developing, but here we have the continuing supply of brand-new 
> materials with new structural properties.

3D printing is making some forms possible that were formerly undoable or so
time-consuming as to be practically undoable.

     http://www.bathsheba.com/

Where it isn't ironic or at least some kind of reference to older art, I
surmise that visual art has tended to follow a path in the 20th c. similar
to that followed by philosophy.  From my (notably
under-informed) perspective, philosophy in the last 100 or so years has come
to consist mostly of an analysis of language.  The metaphysics, epistemology
etc. of canonical philosophy has been deconstructed as linguistics. [3] The
last time I hung out at an art college, I couldn't go a whole day without
barking my shins on the word "semiotic" and similar words related to the
study of language per se.

Am I wandering insufferably far off topic here?


- Mike




[1] Pace REH. It may be a neural ideosyncrasy that, for the most part,
    the trained voice grates on my ear, basses sometimes excepted.

[2] This caught my attention because of Immanuel Velikovsky.  He had
    originally come to North America to research ancient Egypt. His
    Earth in Upheaval and Ages in Chaos were the result of a two
    decade long digression.  He finally got back to Egypt and wrote
    Oedipus & Akhnaton, identifying the Oedipus myth in detail with
    the people, events, art and archaeological remnants of Akhnaton's
    reign. Facinating book.

    Velikovsky obviously did a vry great deal of research.  I doubt
    that I have the patience and dedication to expand into book form
    my short piece tracing the Winnie the Pooh myth back through Rome
    and Akhnaton's Egypt to the Epic of Gilgamesh.  Probably just as
    well. :-)

[3] Which nay now be on the verge of being deconstructed by
    neuroscience.  Film at 11:00.

-- 
Michael Spencer                  Nova Scotia, Canada       .~. 
                                                           /V\ 
[email protected]                                     /( )\
http://home.tallships.ca/mspencer/                        ^^-^^
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to