My wife lost her purse in a crowded local superstore recently.  There was quite 
a lot of money in it, plus credit cards, etc.  When she realized she had done 
that, she dashed back to the store and to the lost and found counter.   She was 
handed her purse.  Everything was in it.  Nothing had been taken.

Ed 
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Keith Hudson 
  To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION,EDUCATION ; de Bivort Lawrence 
  Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:39 AM
  Subject: [Futurework] Extraordinary honesty


  Hi Lawry,

  I've changed the thread for the purpose of this particular posting because it 
concerns the subject of Islam you're interested in. It was triggered off by 
your mention of Turkey where a remarkable example of honesty occurred some 
12/15 years ago. I was in a foursome touring Turkey. One afternoon, the husband 
of the other couple decided he wanted to look the university in Istanbul. On 
the way there, while walking through a park he had a stroke (or something to 
the same effect) which rendered him comatose. This occurred early in the 
afternoon. He was still lying there in the early evening, when it was finally 
realized that an ambulance needed to be called for. Meantime, because he hadn't 
returned to the hotel, I'd been ringing round all the hospitals in the city. By 
coincidence, the hospital I happened to be ringing (the 19th) had just received 
him -- so he'd obviously been lying in the park for several hours. When I 
picked him up from the hospital a few days later he suddenly realized that he 
didn't have his wallet (with a great deal of Turkish money) or his (expensive) 
camera and attachments. Magically, a policeman suddenly appeared with the very 
same items and handed them over. I often wonder whether my friend's ownership 
of his wallet and camera would have survived a similar event in the park of an 
advanced country without a predominant Islamic culture.   

  Keith
  . At 21:52 28/11/2012, you wrote:

    Greetings, everyone,

    This matter of corruption -- and especially corruption of intent -- is 
beautifully laid out in an extraordinary Turkish movie, Takva: a Man's Fear of 
God.  I don't want to give the story away by commenting on it here, but will 
say that it explores this matter deeply and with great authenticity, 
intelligence, and integrity. Plus, it is a riveting movie. Our local library 
has a copy, and so yours may, too. Enjoy!

    Lawry





    On Nov 28, 2012, at 4:38 PM, Ed Weick wrote:


      Perhaps the only way to be a completely incorruptible person in today's 
world is to sit on a mountaintop or to isolate oneself in a little stone cell 
in the depths of a monastery, but even that may not work.  There really isn't 
much room for purists and  idealists.
       
      Ed
       

        ----- Original Message ----- 

        From: Keith Hudson 

        To: RE-DESIGNING WORK, INCOME DISTRIBUTION, EDUCATION ; Ed Weick 

        Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 12:12 PM

        Subject: Re: [Futurework] There's more there than I thought


        Ed,


        The big difference between corruption of senior politicians and 
officials in China and that in the West is that the former speak about it 
openly as being a (continuing) problem while the latter pretend that it only 
happens rarely. It takes slightly different forms in the two countries. In 
China, bribes (usually in the form of shares) are given to close relatives. In 
the West it's more of a nod to the recipient that if he "helps" someone he'll 
be well looked after once he's retired. There's nothing truer than the old 
saying: "Every man has his price".  Even if the price is reputational rather 
than financial, it is never the case (IMO) that an attempt at bribery is met 
with indifference. 


        In the present Tory government in the UK it would be my opinion that 
most of present senior cabinet, including Cameron, plus several Permanent 
Secretaries (the top officials in civil service departments) have been bribed 
with the promise of good jobs later (e.g. directorships, consultancies, top 
jobs with the European Union, etc). In the previous government under Labour, it 
was more of a case of the politicians 'consolidating' hundreds of key 
supporters with high salaries and perks in new 'quasi non-governmental 
organizations' (quangos) which carry out newly-invented civil service type 
functions. In the case of the previous prime minister, Tony Blair, he's been 
living off several different streams of income ever since he retired.


        Psychologists tell us that children tell fibs and devise strategies 
designed to hoodwink others from only three years of age. This suggests that 
deviousness is built into us genetically. This ability to deceive is 
particularly necessary in any ambitiousness male not wishing to upset males of 
higher social ranking (until the right moment to strike comes along!). Sensible 
governmental constitutions in the future will not appeal to idealistic 
abstractions but how to make its financial operations as open as possible.


        Keith




        At 15:52 28/11/2012, you wrote:

          Keith Hudson and I had a brief exchange on the merits of Chrystia 
Freeland's "Plutocrats".  Both of us were bored after the first forty pages or 
so.  He suggested that I read the concluding chapter and give up on the rest of 
the book.  I almost did that but then decided I'd look at the book here and 
there and, lo and behold, I've found some interesting things.  Thus far I've 
read some of the material on "rent-seekers", plutocrats who capture an 
increasing portion of existing wealth rather than producing "value-added" 
wealth themselves.  The American and European financial sectors are outstanding 
examples.  Working in an environment of decreasing regulation, many people in 
the field have become very rich via the invention and refinement of a large 
variety of securities and by shifting much of the risk of doing so onto the 
public sector, knowing full well that government would see them as too big to 
fail and bail them out if things went wrong.  Things did indeed go wrong in 
2008, and with some exceptions like Lehman Brothers, government did bail them 
out, imposing enormous costs on the public sector.



          I guess those of us who've paid any attention to the economy in the 
past few years already knew much of that, but Freeland includes a lot of extra 
information and detail that we couldn't have known unless we were journalists 
in the middle of it all, as she was.  However, there was one thing that was new 
to me in what I read this morning.  That was the role played by "rent-seekers" 
in China's conversion from what was supposed to have been a workers' paradise 
into plutocrat run state capitalism.  According to Freeland, China is as 
corrupt at the top as America, Europe and oligarchic Russia.  I found that 
rather painful because it wasn't supposed to be like that.  When I was young 
and highly idealistic, I followed the Chinese Revolution very closely and 
greatly admired Mao Zedong.  Mao was going to show us all what the world could 
really be like.  Well, what seems to have transpired in reality is another road 
to hell paved with good intentions.



          I'll quit here, but may post more as I read more bits and pieces of 
Freeland's book.



          Ed

          _______________________________________________

          Futurework mailing list

          [email protected]

          https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework


      _______________________________________________
      Futurework mailing list
      [email protected]
      https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework




------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  Futurework mailing list
  [email protected]
  https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to