Seems to me this is now the time to really smack this idea of rapacious
greed in the "head". Any "emergency" of national proportions should take
precedence for the "safety and preservation of the country" over any and
all greed of recompense. If this is really what the 5th amendment
states, then it is time to re-write it. But, when such an "emergency"
may destabilize the entire country, then this should be taken as an
attack on the country itself and the traitors who are attempting to
overthrow the government by these methods (in this case the CEO's, both
past and present, who allowed these destructive patterns to continue)
and these people should be tried as the national criminals they are -
seditionists and traitors.
Sound Good?
Yeh, That will really happen.
D.
Happy New Year everyone.
On 07/01/2013 10:19 PM, Ray Harrell wrote:
*Are all of these CEOS from another planet?*
**
*REH*
**
*JANUARY 7, 2013,****10:30 PM*
Rescued by a Bailout, A.I.G. May Sue Its Savior
*ByBEN PROTESS
<http://dealbook.nytimes.com/author/ben-protess/>andMICHAEL J. DE LA
MERCED <http://dealbook.nytimes.com/author/michael-de-la-merced/>
...
*
Starr argued that the actions violated the Fifth Amendment. "The
government is not empowered to trample shareholder and property rights
even in the midst of a financial emergency," the Starr complaint says.
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
