The Vancouver Sun wrote: > Its architects did not understand where the new world trade > order would lead. Or how to fix it later. Whether the explanation for this is (a) incompetence, (b) negligence or (c) intention, there's no good excuse for it. Sylvia Ostry seems to suggest (a), the most hypocritical explanation. But considering how "they" are continuing or even accelerating the course, (c) seems a more likely explanation. (Btw, the term "globalization" is somewhat misleading -- the 'opposite' term, "Americanization", would be more appropriate to describe the effects on society, individuals and the globe.) Chris
- FW: Why all is not well with globalization - The Van... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Edward R Weick
- Re: FW: Why all is not well with globalization ... Christoph Reuss
- Re: FW: Why all is not well with globalizat... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: FW: Why all is not well with globalization ... Christoph Reuss
- RE: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization ... Edward R Weick
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Ed Goertzen
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Edward R Weick
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
