Brad McCormick wrote: > > (a) incompetence, > > (b) negligence or > > (c) intention, [...] > > (c) seems a more likely explanation. [...] > I think there may be another explanation, which is > far more subtle, although not ipso facto either > better or worse (more or less hopeful, etc.). [...] Your explanation is basically (c). Chris
- FW: Why all is not well with globalization - The Van... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Edward R Weick
- Re: FW: Why all is not well with globalization ... Christoph Reuss
- Re: FW: Why all is not well with globalizat... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- RE: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Christoph Reuss
- RE: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Cordell . Arthur
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization ... Edward R Weick
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Ed Goertzen
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Edward R Weick
- Re: Why all is not well with globalization - Th... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
