|
I've thought about Aurthur's question of what
Canadians should be doing to keep agreements like the FTAA under control.
What I would suggest is that a better way of going about things than protesting
on the streets of Quebec City is getting right into the heart of
things. We have a parliamentary system in Canada, and it has worked
reasonably well in the past, but it is now rapidly becoming a one party
system, dominated by a party of the centre which can ooze into
whatever space appears expedient to it. Important issues hardly need
to be debated. The right, which is also the official opposition, is
imploding and disintegrating over its leadership. It's only power base is
the west; it is simply not credible to most Canadians, including many
westerners. The left was once a powerful force throughout Canada,
but is now confined to only a few areas, mainly the east coast and the
prairies.
Free traders would fit well with the right.
It was the right that originally brought in NAFTA. The kinds of issues
which the protesters presented in Quebec could easily become key issues for the
left. If they got off the streets and became a force within it, the debate
could take place in parliament under the watchful eye of all
Canadians. That, in my opinion, is where it belongs. I'm sure
the left, badly in need of both members and ideas, would welcome most of the
protesters with welcome arms.
Ed Weick
Visit my rebuilt website at:
http://members.eisa.com/~ec086636/
|
- FTAA: my two cents worth Victor Milne
- FTAA: My two cents worth Ed Weick
- RE: FTAA: My two cents worth Cordell . Arthur
- RE: FTAA: My two cents worth Ed Goertzen
- Re: FTAA: My two cents worth Ed Weick
- Ed Weick
