I have examined the report which Keith linked (pdf; 38 pgs) on Global Forests. Keith's conclusion or interpretation that impelled this :
"FutureWork readers might care to be reassured that the situation is improving since then." is not even a glass half full vs half empty difference of opinion. The conclusion of the study is that the RATE of decline is slowing BUT that: "net deforestation at the global level was estimated at an annual rate of approximately 9 million hectares, with gross global deforestation at 13.5 million hectares." (pg 20) (hectare = 2.47 acres) The difference between net/gross is new plantations; and scientists overwhelmingly agree that the rapid growing, monoculture crops deplete the soils fertility and its ability to support long term forestry. Thousands of other species, and watershed characteristics are also affected. Statistics need to be analyzed beyond the numbers. In any case, rational people will "be reassured" when fewer people make demands on expanding forests! Currently earth adds around 90 million people NET yearly, and the forests are still in decline by ANY measure. Per Capita water, soil, forests, fisheries, etc are what count in a living system. Steve -- http://magma.ca/~gpco/ http://www.scientists4pr.org/ Anyone who believes exponential growth can go on forever in a finite world is either a madman or an economist.--Kenneth Boulding
