Chris, I agree that it is quite unacceptable to attack an entire group just because of the actions of a few killers.
Bill Ward On Sun, 18 Aug 2002 16:41:31 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Naw, I think it was Swiss bankers..... > > Chris, prove that it wasn't. > > arthur > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:13 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: pipeline nonsense > > > To make one basic thing clear: This is NOT about "the Jews" [=Jan's > term] > -- as little as it is about "the Muslims". 9/11 was a conspiracy of > a very > small clique, be it (as the official version says) Al-Qaeda or be > it an > US-Israeli group (or perhaps even a "mixed" group, such as > Carlyle/BinLadin). > In both cases, the small clique is unelected, totalitarian, highly > criminal, > and does not only not represent their own people(s), but works to > the harm > of their own people(s). In both cases, there is absolutely no valid > reason > for generalizations from the clique to the people(s), or even for > collective > punishments as in Afghanistan or in US mosques. > > > Jan Matthieu wrote: > > Hell man, do you denie the people who committed those attacks > where > muslims > > now?? Are you insinuating they were Jews? Wake up. Those attacks > were > > perpetrated by muslims. Arabs, Saudi, and Egyptian mostly. Not > Jews. And > > they didn't commit suicide for a pipeline. > > The cannon fodder is pretty irrelevant, as are the pretexts that got > them > into the mission. And were you present in the airplanes to check if > they > were Arabs ? What matters is who pulled the strings and to what > end. > (Btw, did the Anthrax came from Al-Qaeda too?) > > > > For Afghanistan this was the best thing that happened in a long > time. > > Orwell must be spinning in his grave. > > > > If a similar intervention and > > accompanying input of means and money would be effected in for > example > > Congo, it would be welcomed by the overwhelming majority of the > population. > > So what are you waiting for, Jan? If anyone's, that's the job of > Belgium > as the former colonizer of Congo. (I sure hope you won't repeat > the > Lumumba thing in the process.) > > > > > _Although_ the investigators (who have a vested interest in > finding > > > evidence for _their_ version of the tale) failed to produce > convincing > > > evidence so far. > > > > Some people will never be convinced. > > You don't even try to provide the evidence you claimed exists "by > the ton", > although I asked you for it. Pretty telling... > > Chris > > ________________________________________________________________ GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO! Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less! Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit: http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
