Naw, I think it was Swiss bankers..... Chris, prove that it wasn't.
arthur -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, August 16, 2002 9:13 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: pipeline nonsense To make one basic thing clear: This is NOT about "the Jews" [=Jan's term] -- as little as it is about "the Muslims". 9/11 was a conspiracy of a very small clique, be it (as the official version says) Al-Qaeda or be it an US-Israeli group (or perhaps even a "mixed" group, such as Carlyle/BinLadin). In both cases, the small clique is unelected, totalitarian, highly criminal, and does not only not represent their own people(s), but works to the harm of their own people(s). In both cases, there is absolutely no valid reason for generalizations from the clique to the people(s), or even for collective punishments as in Afghanistan or in US mosques. Jan Matthieu wrote: > Hell man, do you denie the people who committed those attacks where muslims > now?? Are you insinuating they were Jews? Wake up. Those attacks were > perpetrated by muslims. Arabs, Saudi, and Egyptian mostly. Not Jews. And > they didn't commit suicide for a pipeline. The cannon fodder is pretty irrelevant, as are the pretexts that got them into the mission. And were you present in the airplanes to check if they were Arabs ? What matters is who pulled the strings and to what end. (Btw, did the Anthrax came from Al-Qaeda too?) > For Afghanistan this was the best thing that happened in a long time. Orwell must be spinning in his grave. > If a similar intervention and > accompanying input of means and money would be effected in for example > Congo, it would be welcomed by the overwhelming majority of the population. So what are you waiting for, Jan? If anyone's, that's the job of Belgium as the former colonizer of Congo. (I sure hope you won't repeat the Lumumba thing in the process.) > > _Although_ the investigators (who have a vested interest in finding > > evidence for _their_ version of the tale) failed to produce convincing > > evidence so far. > > Some people will never be convinced. You don't even try to provide the evidence you claimed exists "by the ton", although I asked you for it. Pretty telling... Chris
