Christoph Reuss wrote:
>
> Pete Vincent pondered:
> > I was thinking about these workers who couldn't
> > schedule their bodily functions to cope with two hour intervals, and I
> > wonder if this is an indication of rampant diabetes, resulting from
> > excessive sugar in the diet. Would have been more appropriate if
> > it was a pop bottling plant...
>
> I think it's quite appropriate that it's a bourbon distillery --
> alcohol (and coffee) is diuretic, so the employees probably drink
> a bit too much in the breaks...
>
> But a fair management would take this into account. ;-)
>
> Chris
I am not so sure about this. (It's also insulting! You *know*
we live in a politically correct age!)
I would rather expect that any ee who diverted any of the
product for personal consumption would be summarily dismissed --
Here, of course, I exclude executives dispensing
the product for business reasons.
The hourly worker's lunch is a personal expense.
The CxO's lunch is a business expense.
Go figure!
\brad mccormick
--
Let your light so shine before men,
that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)
Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)
<![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/
