Greetings from the Pacific Northwest: The Bush administration is actively manipulating the news market to weaken election opposition.  Bush’s speech tonight is timed to coincide with bad monthly economic reports and fears that weekend protests in cities like Portland, New York, New Haven, Conn., Cleveland, San Francisco, Denver and Anchorage would further erode public confidence that “the country is headed in the right direction.”  Are we?

-  Karen Watters Cole

Public Says Bush Needs to Pay Heed to Weak Economy @ http://www.nytimes.com/2002/10/07/politics/07POLL.html

Check out the multimedia charts onsite at the right of this news article to see the numbers and the questions asked in the poll, Chart 1: Bush’s Handling of the economy, Chart 2: Americans on Iraq and the economy:

EXCERPT: “The number of Americans who said they believe the economy is worse than it was just two years ago has increased markedly since the summer.  The number of Americans who approved of the way Mr. Bush has handled the economy — 41 percent — was the lowest it has been in his presidency.  Many people said they worried that a war in Iraq — which most Americans view as inevitable — would disrupt an already unsettled economy.

The poll found that despite the emphasis by Mr. Bush since Labor Day on the need to move against Saddam Hussein, support for such a policy has not changed appreciably since the summer.  While most Americans said they backed Mr. Bush's campaign against Iraq, the sentiment was expressed with reservations and signs of apprehension about its potential repercussions.

Americans said they feared a long and costly war that could spread across the Middle East and encourage more terrorist attacks in the United States.  They said they did not want the United States to act without support from allies and did not want the United States to act before United Nations weapons inspectors had an opportunity to enter Iraq.”

AP/Port Talks Break Down Indefinitely @ http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/business/AP-Port-Labor.html

 

EXCERPT: “A growing number of industry groups are calling for White House intervention, including use of the Taft-Hartley Act, which would force an 80-day cooling off period. President Bush hasn't said whether he would step in to a dispute that some experts say could cost the economy $2 billion a day.

 

The port lockdown entered its second week Monday, with the number of cargo vessels stranded at the docks or backing up at anchor points rising to 200 and dozens more were still en route from Asia.

 

Analysts and business leaders have warned the shutdown will cause a noticeable increase in plant closings, job losses and financial market turmoil.

 

Already, storage facilities at beef, pork and poultry processing facilities across the country are full, crammed with produce that can't be exported.

 

With nowhere to move their product, plant operators were expected to begin shutting down Monday with layoffs to follow, said Mary Kay Thatcher, public policy director of the American Farm Bureau Federation.

 

In less than two weeks, if the shutdown continues, manufacturing plants will be grinding to a halt all over the country, farmers will be up in arms, and Asian equity and currency markets could face a full blown crisis, said Steven Cohen, a University of California, Berkeley professor of regional planning.”

AP/President Bush intervening in port lockout @ http://www.kgw.com/business/stories/kgw_1007_nation_bush_port.95fd2d81.html

EXCERPT: “The move could be a first step toward ordering workers back onto the job under Taft-Hartley. But some senior officials take a dim view of forcing the workers back to work, because the 1947 law has a poor record of success.”

Reply via email to