Harry, Whatever you may say about the legality of Bush's election (as a foreigner, I have absolutely no view on this), there can be little doubt that Bush and some of his close associates escape prosecution in the coming months and years they will certainly go down in history as one of the most suspicious that there ever has been.
My economic views support free trade -- in the liberal tradition of 19th century England. Yet I have never voted Conservative (present-day upholders of free trade) in my life because I have never trusted them. If I were American I don't know whether I would have ever have refused to vote Republican for the same reason. But if I had ever voted for them, then I would certainly feel deeply ashamed right now. I've just been listening to "File on Four", a BBC radio programme which investigates corrupt business practice extremely carefully. It never make charges lightly. It came to the conclusion that the evidence of sleaze and corruption against Cheney, Thomas White (Secretary to the Army) and Larry Thompson (Chairman of Bush's ethic committee) was so serious at the beginning of this year, that Bush had to deflect public attention by his policy against Iraq. He will keep up his crazy war-talk until at least the November elections are over. Keith At 11:24 12/10/02 -0700, you wrote: >Brad, > >Bush is prepared to give in order to get and he has been quite successful. > >You'll note that Saddam has given permission for full inspection by the UN. >If he retreats from this agreement, he is likely to suffer from war. Maybe >full inspection will be a reality and the fears of Saddam's prospective >victims will be allayed. > >Why were the inspectors pulled out last time? Because he knew he could get >away with it. He thumbed his nose at the UN and they didn't have the >gumption to protest. > >He knows that Bush has the gumption to act. We'll see if that will cut him >down to size. > >If it works, we might be able to force the other recalcitrants along the >road to peace and cooperation. Maybe North Korea and others will become >more lovable if they know there is a determined American President. > >But, if there is a hint of weakness any such pressure will disappear like a >pricked balloon. > >Kennedy took us to the brink of nuclear war. The reason for the Russian >climb-down was because they thought that Kennedy would do what he promised. > >Can you imagine what might have happened had Nobel winner Jimmy Carter been >in the chair at that time. I rather think we would have had our nuclear war >- not then, but in due course. Jimmy is as nice a person as one might meet, >but he was a horrible President. > >Democrat propaganda during the election was entirely ad hominem. Bush was >depicted as a rock ribbed, right wing conservative, who was unintelligent, >un-learned, a pawn of his father, a puppet for the oil interests, and a >local boy. He obviously didn't have chance. > >Opposing him was an 8 year vice-President, a Washington patrician, a >politician who had travelled the world. > >It was an uneven contest. > >In fact it was no contest. Yet, when they faced each other in debate, Bush >won. While the European papers chortled over every mis-speak - those who >were watching the two, chose Bush. > >The Florida vote was over 7 days after the election according to law. Bush >had won. Everything that happened thereafter was illegal. The Court has no >right to make laws. Yet, they did when they refused to accept Kathleen >Harris' closure of the polling. > >The law was clear, but the Florida Supreme Court were all political >democrats and I rather think they had their orders. > >Poor Kathleen Harris who as Secretary of State has a job that is mostly >sinecure. Her only real official duty was the ceremonial certification of >the vote, 7 days after the election. This, she dutifully did according to law. > >She became the target for democrat frustration with the loss. As Reuters >later reported: "Harris also received death threats, and she became the >butt of countless jokes on late-night television shows. Critics panned not >just her decisions but her dress sense and enthusiastic hand with make-up." > >Yet, she had only one ceremonial decision - to declare the election over at >the appropriate time on the appropriate day. If Republicans had used Uzis >to keep democrats from the poll, that was not her concern. She just had to >say 'the seven days are up and the results are recorded'. > >However, she will be soon be a congresswoman so perhaps then all will be >forgiven. > >The result of all this was the democrat scream that Bush had stolen the >election. That Gore had really won. > >It was nonsense, but perhaps it salves the disappointment and anger of >Democrats in cushy jobs who had to give them up to Republicans. > >Thus for you Europeans, Keith, the fantasy has become fact. Bush is a dumbo >who stole the election from Gore. I would remind you that since the steel >tariff (ugh!) the administration has been busy making special import >concessions (106 last time I noticed it). In return, Bush has managed to >get 'fast track' authority to proceed with trade negotiations - something >that Clinton lost. > >Incidentally, Bush managed it with the help of the textile industry support >- amazing considering the effect of imports on the industry. > >So, this dumbo hick seems not to be doing too badly. His reputed >negotiating skills seem to the fore. We'll see how he does if the Democrats >get both houses in next month's election. The Democrats sole interest at >that point will be kicking Bush out at the next election. > >It's politics, you know - which activity takes precedence over everything >in this over-politicized nation. > >Read again what you wrote, Brad. > >Politics seems to be getting in the way of your thinking, which is a shame >for you think so well. > >Harry > >--------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------------- > > >Brad wrote: > >>Harry Pollard wrote: >>[snip] >> > Of course, Bush could be a dumbo who doesn't know the time of day. >> >>He knows it's ALWAYS time for everybody to tell him how >>great a Leader of The Free World he is. >> >> > Yet, >> > have you noticed how often he gets his way? Remember, I have been saying >> > for months that his reputation is that of a negotiator. He was good at this >> > in Texas. Maybe in Washington, he isn't being eaten alive (as was expected) >> > but is getting a lot of his own way. >> >>Ah! Now I see the right analogy to "Munich": Everybody giving >>in to this hypertrophied baby's threat of throwing a WMD temper >>tantrum. >> >> > >> > We'll see how it plays. >> >>I finished [re-]watching Werner Herzog's _Lessons of Darkness_. >>One of the most striking passages is where we see oil fires >>over the land, and the narrator explains that the people >>will seek to escape in death, but death will flee from them. >> >> You better not pout, >> you better not cry! >> You better not pout, >> I'm telling you why: >> George W Bush is coming to town. >> He's making a list, >> and checking it twice: >> He's gonna find out who's naughty and nice! >> George W Bush is coming to town! >> He sees you when you're sleeping. >> He knows when you're awake. >> He knows if you've been bad or good, >> so be good for goodness sake.... >> >>I hope Saddam is [to use that famous word deployed by >>every parent/schoolmarm vis-a-vis every misbehaving child]: LISTENING. >> >>I have a friend who says that there are certain people >>who are in need of *retroactive birth control*. Any wonder why >>Bush is against a woman's right to choose? >> >>\brad mccormick > >****************************** >Harry Pollard >Henry George School of LA >Box 655 >Tujunga CA 91042 >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Tel: (818) 352-4141 >Fax: (818) 353-2242 >******************************* > > >--- >Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. >Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). >Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/2002 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------ Keith Hudson, General Editor, Handlo Music, http://www.handlo.com 6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX, England Tel: +44 1225 312622; Fax: +44 1225 447727; mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ________________________________________________________________________
