Hi Karen,

At 15:25 02/01/03 -0800, you wrote:
<<<<
Should we be suspicious?  These are the guys who love secrecy and
'privacy'.  Just another example of underfunding?  

And the war hasn't even started yet.  KWC
>>>>

Clearly a political decision. (And, I'd suggest, an early indication that
the Bush administration is already nervous about the American economy.) It
is similar to the way that several successive governments (both Tory and
Labour, but particularly the latter) have been manipulating unemployment
statistics for the past 15/20 years in this country. Today, the low
unemployment in England (of about 500,000, if I remember rightly) is
understated by at least 1,500,000 by various classification devices.

Keith
 
<<<<
U.S. Drops Report On Mass Layoffs 
Data Helped States Track Patterns of Industrial Demise 

By Kirstin Downey, Washington Post Staff Writer. Thursday, January 2, 2003

Citing a shortage of money, the Bureau of Labor Statistics will stop
publishing information about factory closings across the country, a
decision that some state officials and labor leaders are protesting.  The
monthly Labor Department analysis, known as the Mass Layoffs Statistics
report, detailed where workplaces with more than 50 employees closed and
what kinds of workers were affected. 

"We have finite resources," said Mason M. Bishop, deputy assistant
secretary for the Labor Department's Employment and Training
Administration, which has been paying about $6.6 million a year for the BLS
report.  The department made the announcement on Christmas Eve, as a note
on its November -- and final -- report.

The report said U.S. employers initiated 2,150 mass layoffs in November,
with workers in manufacturing most affected. About 240,000 workers lost
their jobs, it said.

Bishop said that the Labor Department had only $30 million for its
dislocated-worker demonstration project, and that it could no longer afford
the report. "We believe we need to be funding programs that get people back
to work," he said.  Some state officials, who help compile data for the
report, criticized the decision.  They said the monthly reports helped them
steer unemployed people to jobs in new industries.

"In the current recession, MLS data have increased in value and are being
followed and evaluated more closely," Catherine B. Leapheart, president of
the National Association of State Work Force Agencies, wrote in a letter to
Labor Secretary Elaine L. Chao.  "The states have come to rely on this
information as an economic indicator and a tool for operational decisions
on service delivery and funding allocations for dislocated-worker programs."

State officials around the country said they were surprised and unhappy to
hear the report was canceled.  "In these times when the economy is in
transition, knowing what's going on and who it's going on to, is critical,"
said Harry E. Payne Jr., chairman of the North Carolina Employment Security
Commission.  "It's an axiom of human nature that you focus on what you can
measure. Now they are taking away a measure."

Payne said North Carolina has been hard hit by plant closings, including
those by textile and fiber-optics companies that have moved jobs overseas.
He said the program was the only national, standardized source of data
tracking plant closings, allowing states to compare their manufacturing
layoffs with those of other states. 

"To give it up is just awful," said Beverly Gumola of the Illinois
Department of Employment Security. State officials use the data to
determine "which occupations are going kaput," she said.  Christine L.
Owens, director of public policy for the AFL-CIO, whose member unions have
been hard hit by the loss of manufacturing jobs, said eliminating the
report is an example of a "let-them-eat-cake approach" by the Bush
administration.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A63950-2003Jan1.html




----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------
Keith Hudson,6 Upper Camden Place, Bath BA1 5HX, England
Tel:01225 312622/444881; Fax:01225 447727; E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
________________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to