There has been a flurry of writing recently about
the nature of work. As someone who has been part of this list since it
began in the mid '90's I see this theme recur every now and again - but never
really get thrashed through.
Much of what is said recognises our current
thinking about 'work' - that it is tedious, often poorly constructed and mostly
about earning enough income to live. From this perspective it is very hard
to imagine how it might usefully be reconstructed (which is why the thread dies
out so quickly, to be replaced by other things which appear easier to discuss
even if they are no easier to resolve).
"Work" as we now know it has a less than two
hundred year history. This is not to say that people prior to that time
didn't work, just they didn't think of work as we do now.
The concept of 'going to work' is an industrial,
factory or mine, concept. The idea that 'work' was something you did away
from the rest of your life was invented at the same time as the industrial
revolution. Prior to that, work was what you did during your life to
provide what you or those around you needed. While there was a distinction
between 'work' and 'not work' prior to the Industrial Revolution (people
probably 'played' much more then than now, for example) it was only a
theoretical distinction - both 'work' and 'non work' were part of
life.
Only in the last two hundred years has work become
outside life in the individual sense, but a critical part of life in a societal
sense. And therein is the dilemma.
According to our current wisdom, we need to
sacrifice some portion of our individual lives in work in order for society to
survive. And, as many people have noted in recent days, much of this
sacrifice is painful, non productive and just plain stupid, but it does actually
contribute to societies survival (though some want to question whether what we
experience ought to be called survival).
Undoing that current wisdom is very difficult, it
pervades everything we see, and all the material things we own or watch others
own.
But the fact is that it is a recent way of looking
at the world. In my experience over the past nine years now that I have
been actively working to create a better future for work I have found that if we
can actually look beyond 'economic work' (or job as I prefer to call it, because
language becomes very difficult here) we can imagine other ways to organise
ourselves to get done what needs doing (which is after all what our real
objective is).
I know in my life and in the life of those around
me, things have been greatly enriched when we have begun from a premise which at
least provides the potential for everyone to have a meaningful place in the
world (which is not one of the premises on which economics is
based).
All of the above has been said without mentioning
money, income or redistribution. Which just shows how far we can get in
our thinking if we also put aside these post-industrial revolution concepts as
well.
Charles Brass
Chairman the futures foundation PO Box 122 Fairfield 3078 Australia phone 61 3 9459 0244 the mission of the futures foundation is
"...to engage all Australians in creating a better future..." |
- [Futurework] The world of work Ed Weick
- RE: [Futurework] The world of work Bruce Leier
- Re: [Futurework] The world of work Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] The world of work Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] The world of work Charles Brass
- Re: [Futurework] The world of work Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] The world of ... Charles Brass
- Re: [Futurework] The world... Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] The w... Selma Singer
- Re: [Futurework] The w... Charles Brass
- Re: [Futurework] The w... Ray Evans Harrell
- Re: [Futurework] The world... Brian McAndrews
- Re: [Futurework] The w... Charles Brass
- Re: [Futurework] The world... Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] The w... Ed Weick
- Re: [Futurework] The w... Brad McCormick, Ed.D.
- Re: [Futurework] The w... Ed Weick