Title: Having conducted an intense global psy0

Having conducted an intense global psychological warfare to intimidate the enemy, one of the unexpected side effects of using global media is that the American public also got the same dosage, and now the Bush team is once again busy lowering expectations. - KWC

Bush Moves to Prepare Public for a Harder War

By R. W. Apple Jr., NYT, March 24, 2003 @ http://www.nytimes.com/2003/03/24/international/worldspecial/24ASSE.html

WASHINGTON, March 23 — Like a coach seeking a psychological advantage, President Bush pressed an effort today to temper public anticipation of an early, relatively painless victory in the fighting in Iraq.  "It is evident that it's going to take a while to achieve our objective," the President said on the White House lawn after returning from Camp David.

 

…The administration has always expected that there would be setbacks before the war's end, especially in the environs of Baghdad, where the Republican Guard is concentrated and where the use of chemical and other weapons of mass destruction is thought more likely.  As that phase of the war draws closer, an overconfident, easily shaken public could be a problem for the administration.

 

Washington has ample reason to try to dampen the excitement.  A New York Times/CBS News poll, based on interviews Thursday through Saturday, shows that Americans' expectations have been rising as they watched, read and listened to accounts of wide swaths of Baghdad set ablaze by coalition bombs and missiles and American tanks racing easily and thrillingly across undefended sands. Early this month, with war clearly looming on the horizon, 43 percent of those interviewed said they expected a quick and successful campaign, as opposed to 50 who said they foresaw a protracted struggle. But late last week, 63 percent — almost two-thirds — told interviewers that they thought the war would end quickly.  More than half said that they thought the war would end in a matter of weeks rather than in months. 

 

Part of the reason is the way that the war is being reported.  Any large-scale conflict can be viewed through several lenses, with subtly different results. The correspondent moving forward with a company or a battalion of combat troops will usually get the most vivid picture, with the most telling detail, but it may show little about the overall flux of the battle. Often he or she, lacking the broad view, will be too optimistic or too pessimistic.

 

In Vietnam, reporters were able to move from level to level, if they could find transportation and if they were brave enough.  In the 1991 Gulf War, they had almost no access to the front-line soldier's perspective. This time, the system is more like the one used in World War II, except that correspondents are said to be "embedded" with small units rather than accredited to them.  (end of excerpts)

 

 

Reply via email to