Question: Which is the bigger concern, Walmart or e-Bay?

--

Answer (not to the above question, however): Example of
how competition can be constructive.  Yes, you
read that right! BMcC saying competition can be good!

    We want to build something that is beyond our existing
    technological knowledge. There are two (or more...) design
    concepts, each of which looks equally (un)promising from the
    vantage point of our best judgement. So we create competing
    teams to each make a prototype of one of the proposed
    designs, to the very best of their ability. And, when
    the prototypes are done, we compare them and choose
    the best one. (Obviously, some designs may demonstrate
    they are not the right way to go without any comparison --
    as problems and downside side-effects manifest themselves
    during the prototyping activity. On the other hand,
    trying to build the prototypes may suggest a previously
    unimagined idea which is far more promising than any
    of the original competing alternatives. Etc.)
    [I have heard that, back in the 1950s, IBM
    designed some products exactly this way.]

    Note that, whatever alternative design is chosen, none
    of the persons working on the losing designs lose their
    jobs, since, after the competition is over, they all get
    to work on production implementation of the winner. Indeed,
    production implementation of the winning design should be
    expected to benefit from the different experience those
    who worked on the losing designs bring to their
    post-competition activity.

And if anyone objects: "But if you don't threaten people with
starvation they won't get off their duffs!"  I would ask
about the spirit of "good sportsmanship" and "amateurism"
embodied in the best of English aristocarcy (i.e., the
best who strive to be the best, AKA aristoi...), as exemplified,
e.g., in -- it comes to mind yet again today -- the movie
"Chariots of Fire"....

[Also, there's the Rumsfeld thewory of social welfare
and national security.  Rumsfeld
explained that he didn't much care if somebody like MCI went
bankrupt, since the material and personnel assets would
not thereby be destroyed, and the market need -- e.g.,
DoD's need --a  for the
telecom services would still exist, so that all that
would happen is that the assets of MCI would be bought
up by some other company and everything would
proceed as if nothing had happened.]

\brad mccormick

--
  Let your light so shine before men,
              that they may see your good works.... (Matt 5:16)

Prove all things; hold fast that which is good. (1 Thes 5:21)

<![%THINK;[SGML+APL]]> Brad McCormick, Ed.D. / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-----------------------------------------------------------------
  Visit my website ==> http://www.users.cloud9.net/~bradmcc/

_______________________________________________
Futurework mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework

Reply via email to