>Now I suppose neo-Luddites would propose *not* deploying the >most advanced technology. (Which might make me end up >pulling weeds with my hands, Yuk!)
I was recently surprised to learn that the Luddites were not against automation. They we against a few weavers trying to capture the whole market by lowering prices below the fixed prices which were part of their system. > >I think there is a fundamental issue that engages >here: What should be part of the economy and what shouldn't? > It something makes money it can be part of the economy. Most of the important work is outside of the economy, or should be. Motherhood is the prime example. Unearned income for all will allow people to choose work regardless of the income it may, or may not, provide. We don't have to answer this question if freedom is a reality. Barry Brooks _______________________________________________ Futurework mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://scribe.uwaterloo.ca/mailman/listinfo/futurework
