Back on the domestic front, attending to that two-tier society, Bush2 continues to wage class warfare by defunding programs it doesn’t like or much care about.   Also note that the administration is attacking NGO’s that do not fit into their neoconservative philosophy, expecting them to be branches of government. 

Both of these below, from OMB Watch.  Links are live.  KWC

 

Children Bear Brunt of Federal Tax Cuts

Published On: 07/28/2003 04:48 PM @ http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/1703/

In the absence of federal assistance, childcare, education, and children’s health programs are being slashed across the country despite their popularity and effectiveness.

For instance:

  • Ohio cut $268 million in childcare assistance funding, leaving 18,500 fewer children without care;
  • Massachusetts cut all $5 million in funding for after-school and out-of-school grants to communities;
  • Georgia cut $156 million in K-12 education funding;
  • Minnesota cut $350 million in healthcare for children and families, ending coverage for a projected 38,000 people;
  • Texas cut $428 million in child health care, ending coverage for 170,000 children; and
  • In Oregon, more than 50 school districts shortened the 2002-03 school year by up to 24 days to offset lost tax revenue.

The ability of states to provide these services has been greatly diminished by recent tax cuts, costing $1.7 trillion, decreased revenue as a result of the sluggish economy, and severe reductions in federal spending, including funding for the Childcare and Development Block Grant.

 

For most states, the federal government provides between 50 percent and 70 percent of health and social service spending for children, which often encourages additional state and local funding, according to a new study by the Every Child Matters Education Fund. In 2001, for instance, $6.5 billion in federal funding for childcare assistance was matched by $1.6 billion in state funds. Without such assistance, states are being forced to roll back crucial services, as they face budget deficits in the range of $70 to $85 billion for state fiscal year 2004, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

 

Moreover, assuming that states do not act to “decouple” their tax codes from federal law, the new 2003 tax cuts are estimated to reduce state revenues by $3 billion over the next two years, and if expiring provisions are extended, $16 billion or more over the next 10 years. In addition, repeal of taxes on inherited wealth is projected to cost the states $9 billion a year.

 

Meanwhile, the Bush administration has pressed to devolve formerly state and federal responsibilities to community-based nonprofits and other service providers, which are seeing their caseloads balloon just as the rug is being pulled out from under them, with federal funding down and private giving diminished as a result of the poor economy. This has led to further severe cutbacks in children’s services, as detailed in a a recent report by Venture Philanthropy Partners.

Children’s advocates view the administration’s budget decisions as shortsighted. Greater investments in children’s programs in the 1990s corresponded with improved outcomes. For instance, the Kids Count report by the Annie E. Casey Foundation found that eight out of 10 child-well-being indicators improved from 1990 and 2000.

In addition to research indicating the effectiveness of children’s programs, there is evidence that the public is willing to pay for child and family services. In a recent national survey, 68 percent of registered voters preferred greater investments in their children and grandchildren over tax cuts, which received only 24 percent support.

Nonetheless, the Bush administration has gone in the other direction, forcing hundreds of millions of dollars in cuts for childcare, children’s health care, as well as pre-kindergarten and after-school programs. Kids are beginning to feel the brunt of the severe drop in federal and state revenues, and without a dramatic change in the country’s fiscal priorities, the worst is yet to come.

An Attack on Nonprofit Speech: Death By a Thousand Cuts (Summary) @ http://www.ombwatch.org/article/articleview/1701/

 

“Perhaps nothing is as central to the nonprofit sector as protecting its right to speak out on issues.  For example, when there were attacks on nonprofit advocacy in 1983 and 1995, the sector organized galvanizing responses to fend them off.  Unfortunately, it appears that such attacks are again surfacing, but in ways that are broader yet much harder to fight back.

 

Instead of a single legislative or regulatory proposal that would limit nonprofit speech, the Bush administration and conservative allies have proposed or begun implementing a number of proposals that are akin to a “death by a thousand cuts.”  These “cuts,” which have suddenly accelerated in the last year, come in three areas:

 

  • Attacks on nonprofit advocacy, particularly when there are disagreements with Bush administration policies;
  • Limits imposed by government on other nonprofit speech, particularly targeted to those working on issues, such as reproductive rights and HIV/AIDS, where there may be ideological differences with the administration.  Additionally nonprofits, particularly those involved in international development activities, face actions taken to control their speech; and
  • Changes made by nonprofits resulting from fear of how laws such as the USA Patriot Act are being implemented.

 

There is now a growing litany of examples under each of these three categories, but because each proposal or action affects only limited numbers of nonprofits, they have not drawn significant attention.  Yet the proposals and actions by the Bush administration and conservatives are already taking their toll.  Even when proposals have been dropped, they leave a chill on speaking out on issues in their wake.  Taken together, they paint a mosaic that should cause great concern for every nonprofit – and should be a rallying cry for nonprofit sector leaders.  This administration -- and its conservative allies – is stifling free _expression_ and using the heavy hand of government to quash dissent.”

 

 

Reply via email to